In regards to politics, both sides have pet projects, it's just tax and spend raises money for said pet projects. I needn't tell you what the last administration's pet project was, but it was funded by reckless borrowing and drastic cuts to local aid among others, all to keep their other pet project, corporate welfare. We're deep in debt because of the last administration's spending without revenue, and once again, we're looking at said same party as last administration looking towards the small funded pet causes of the other party, and hoping their supporters have the attention span of a goldfish to forget how they basically had an endless credit card they could blame on the next guy.DeGrasse Tyson was making a generalization, if you will, in regards to Romney's statement - funding for PBS is, in this case, not the equivalent of uninstalling WoW (or any large application or game) from a system. It's basically makes too small of a footprint to make a difference, which is why Romney's statement for cutting PBS funding is flawed and makes no sense.
The analogy is shockingly apt here... we have to make "disk space" by clearing out the small text files, some needed, but they can't touch the bigger files. And in this case, the bigger files are HD porn, HQ illegally downloaded music, video games they got very bored of half way through, and (for the sake of analogy), they back up files of everyone they know. Basically, they have things only them and their friends can enjoy and take advantage of, but deny any slight edge that could help anyone else, no matter how low the cost is. Even if the initial cost is cheaper for everyone in the short run.I just find the actual example ironic for the aforementioned reason. I'm required to reduce disk space but I'm not allowed to touch the giant files causing the problem, so I'm stuck removing text files.
It's politics of selfishness and "our farts don't stink."