Well, Sesame Workshop can't use Kermit as a roving reporter anymore because they can't afford the fees Disney charges for him. That doesn't seem super friendly to me-- charging a non-profit an arm and a leg for a character they used for years before you got a hold of him. I know SST hadn't used Kermit much in the years prior to Disney's purchase of the Muppets but that still irks me.
True Disney is somewhat protective of Kermit as he is really the core icon of their brand - the Muppet. Just like Sesame and Henson are protective of the exposure and control of core properties. Although the companies get along, work together on projects and are fairly friendly, they all want to make sure that their individual brands and properties remain distinctive and they retain their own identity in the public eye. That’s one reason why Henson altered the title screens on the early Fraggle Rock DVDs to remove the word “Muppet” – not because Disney legally demanded them to, but because they wanted to distance themselves from “The Muppets”. And one of the reasons for Kermit’s exclusion of the Emmet Otter DVD had to do Disney wanting to ensure a separation of properties. So while that armadillo puppet may have be used on Disney owned “Bear in the Big Blue House” and the DVD extras of “Kermit’s Swamp Years”, it has been used on “The Animal Show” and “Puppet Up!” - no one is overly concerned about him, he’s not a core brand asset like Kermit. Disney wants Kermit (and those other core characters) to be associated with their productions and their brand, especially in these early years while distinguishing themselves from Henson and Sesame. Similarly Sesame and Henson are distinguishing their brands from the Disney owned stuff. No one is being mean here, it’s a mutual understanding of preserving all of the separate ownerships. They just want to make sure the public can distinguish between the owners and productions. Again, with the use and law behind intellectual properties, such as characters, more focus is on the intent behind it and public perception of it. As long as Henson doesn’t present their stuff as being associated with or endorsed by or a part of the now Disney owned “Muppet” brand they are pretty free from legal complications with the mouse. That’s why the word Muppet and even phrases like “from the creators of the Muppets” and such aren’t used. But bah-humbug to all this law talk, it’s complicated and there’s really nothing that our yammering will change about it. Things are what things are - Henson, Disney and Sesame all seem to be okay with the positions they are in. And Kermie may not be reappearing on Sesame Street much anymore (which isn't totally a Disney thing, it started after Jim passed away but was really driven home when Henson sold Sesame off), at least many of those classic gems Jim produced are seeing the light of day in the Old School sets.
But back to Tinseltown...that is what
this threads about, right... if you look on
AlienBootCamp.com right now, you’ll see Tinseltown is the highest rated video on the entire site! Hooray for being #1 (with an impressive 5-star average rating). Hopefully that sends a positive message to Logo and Henson... although it couldn't hurt to take a few seconds to
drop them an email of thanks and support as well. I can't wait for more!