I like Tim Burton mainly when he has original ideas. When he remakes other people's work I'm often disappointed. The only exception being his Batman films. I'll take them over Dark Knight any day, hehe.
The first two movies that were his doing had a style to them, and we probably wouldn't have had everyone's favorite Batman adaption, Batman TAS, if it wasn't for those films.
But the second two that weren't under his control were putrid. Forever was alright, though I hate how Two-Face was basically just doing warmed over Joker schtick instead of actually being Two-Face. But saying the next film was a franchise killing disaster that Batman almost never walked out of isn't even an understatement. The DVD commentary is reportedly Joel Schumaker apologizing for the whole 90 minutes. The Chris Nolan movies didn't just rescue the franchise, it made it WB's biggest selling point. In the span of the three movies, we've got just as many Batman cartoons (counting the upcoming Beware the Batman). Considering that they've failed at Rebooting Superman once (we won't know about the next one until next year), had iffy footing on the overbudgeted Green Lantern, and are absolutely fumble thumbs over trying to get Wonder Woman her own project (not to mention whatever the heck Jonah Hex was for), they haven't just been lucky with the Chris Nolan Batman films. They're basically the only thing they have that's remotely quality as a film franchise.
Marvel, BTW, just keeps licensing out characters to make movies, and the law of averages states that they have more lousy films than good ones... but they have at least 2 or 3 a year since the first Spider-Man. And they've rebooted Hulk twice, with a third on the way.
But I do like Tim Burton's two Batman films. But if you heard what his plans were for Superman, you're hair would stand up on end. But he's more of a dark film expert anyway. That works better for Batman than Superman.