And the constant references to his being an oil baron was irrelevant? Not to mention the joke that Kermit had been deceived into thinking he's a wealthy "philanthropist" when he was really going to tear the theater down? Nowadays you can't pick "oil baron" and then say "but it means nothing."
B-friggin-S. I'm calling
complete Shenanigans on your statement in full.
The rich guy as bad guy is a common plot device used in film and literature for years. You might as well go after The Muppet Movie's Doc Hopper for exposing the evils of franchises and big business, Muppet Christmas Carol for Scrooge being an evil rich guy or how about we go after Muppets From Space for its liberal anti-government message in how a xenophobic secret institution treats an alien Muppet. And should we bring up wealthy, cigar-chomping JP Grosse's treatment of the hard-working vaudevillian cast of the Muppet Show?
The Muppets make fun of everybody and people in power positions often get their comeuppance. This is nothing new in the world of entertainment since before the time of Shakespeare! Any financial motive in the film was employed as a thin plot device. The television executive was more actively driven by profit than Tex. In fact, I actually would have liked to see some sort of anti-corporation/green message actually in the film. Environmentalism was very important to Jim Henson and that theme began saturating much of his work toward the end of his life.
But keep your usual contrarian point of view on the matter. I disagree with it 100%