Because this thread has already been blown wau into gigantic proportions, and there's really nowhere for me to contribute anymore, I'll just add my half-a-cent's worth to the pot...
When it comesto the new, my only problem is when they do all the things they SHOULDN'T do: see, the people who take charge of the new feel this need that they need to "modernize" and "update" the characters and such so that they'll appeal today's audiences, hence why most remakes of classics are just plain terrible, but the characters haven't grown or developed, they've just completely changed, because apparently, today people like the fart jokes and thecrap jokes, and all that stuff like Drtooth has mentioned several times.
That's probably the reason why people like Charles Schulz have always discouraged changing characters and such, and while I see where he's coming from, there's a difference between change and development: and there's nothign wrong with developing characters overtime, because it reflects real life scenarios, thus making the characters more believable and relatable, because people in real life grow and develop from the experiences they've had in their lives... why do you think M*A*S*H was on the air for so long? Unlike most shows back in those days where watching an episode from a later season is almost the same as watching an episode from an earlier season, the series grew and the characters grew and developed as it progressed. Even Sonia Manzano has said she believes that's why so many people have continued to watch SST over the years because the humans were allowed to age and grow and develop with the show, which reflects real life, and we've all seen how Maria grew on the show, from the teenaged Latina who mingled with the resident cool cat, to being a loving wife and mother, aas well as a confidant for the Muppet characters and such.
That, there's nothing wrong with, it's just the complete change of a character's personality just because they feel the personality and such they had in the past will seem "dated" if they were like that in today's modern society; again, that's why so many new incarnations or remakes fail miserably... is it no wonder why already Winnie the Pooh is so successful?
And that brings something else to mind to: whenever new technology comes out, there's always such a hype about it, and it's exploited for all it's worth, when newer isn't always better... like I've said before, you know how all this stuff is shot today in "HD" and "digital" formats that are supposed to be superior to previous formats? Yeah, take a look at something that was shot on 35mm film (properly restored and remastered of course), and compare it to something that was shot in "HD"/"digital" format... you see a BIG difference, but not the kind that we're supposed to see... the filmed piece is of a far superior quality, clear, clean, sharp, whereas the "HD" piece is pixelated, blurry at times, and looks like a video that was posted on YouTube. I mean, look at the 40 Years of Sunny Days DVD, just look how crystal clear the clips are just before Season 39 and 40... and those were shot on VIDEO TAPE, which was supposed to be a cheaper, and lower-quality alternative to film. And, people always claim you lose 25% of your picture in "full screen", well, you lose 25% of your picture in widescreen too, only difference is in full screen, the only thing you lose is people standing off to the side and staring into space, with widescreen you lose the tops of people's heads, and other such things... I'd rather lose people standing off to the side and do nothing but stare into space as oppsed to the tops of people's heads and such.
I could go on, but I don't think I will.