• Welcome to the Muppet Central Forum!
    You are viewing our forum as a guest. Join our free community to post topics and start private conversations. Please contact us if you need help.
  • Christmas Music
    Our 24th annual Christmas Music Merrython is underway on Muppet Central Radio. Listen to the best Muppet Christmas music of all-time through December 25.
  • Macy's Thanksgiving Parade
    Let us know your thoughts on the Sesame Street appearance at the annual Macy's Parade.
  • Jim Henson Idea Man
    Remember the life. Honor the legacy. Inspire your soul. The new Jim Henson documentary "Idea Man" is now streaming exclusively on Disney+.
  • Back to the Rock Season 2
    Fraggle Rock Back to the Rock Season 2 has premiered on AppleTV+. Watch the anticipated new season and let us know your thoughts.
  • Bear arrives on Disney+
    The beloved series has been off the air for the past 15 years. Now all four seasons are finally available for a whole new generation.
  • Sam and Friends Book
    Read our review of the long-awaited book, "Sam and Friends - The Story of Jim Henson's First Television Show" by Muppet Historian Craig Shemin.

Should there be a Sesame Street Channel?

mbmfrog

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2005
Messages
1,031
Reaction score
466
The way I see it the thought of an acutal Sesame Street Channel is a great idea as the show does have ALOT of history. :smile:


I say if it does come true, then I'll watch it from time to time. :insatiable:
 

WAYMOND

Active Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2008
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
A SS channel would be awsome! My wife and I only allow our son to watch SS and Muppet shows/movies. I don't think I could stand Barney or Dora the Explora. There are so many seasons of Sesame Street that they could have a never ending line up of shows all day long. In mean, if other stations can run marathons of MASH, Friends, Sex and the City...why not SS?

W
 

Oscarfan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 2, 2008
Messages
7,528
Reaction score
3,961
There are so many seasons of Sesame Street that they could have a never ending line up of shows all day long. In mean, if other stations can run marathons of MASH, Friends, Sex and the City...why not SS?

W
Just listen to what those 5 0r 6 angry mothers said about the Old School DVDs.
 

WAYMOND

Active Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2008
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
I know this is old news but please fill me in. What exactly were the complaints with Old School? Just curious!

I have volume 1 and I think it's great. My son and I watch it all the time. I plan on getting Volume 2 this fall.
 

Drtooth

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2002
Messages
31,717
Reaction score
6,710
I know this is old news but please fill me in. What exactly were the complaints with Old School? Just curious!

Their 1 month olds won't sit still because Elmo's not all over it. The reason why they have to put those "warning lables" on the DVD's.

I think parents need to realise kids aren't supposed to watch TV (regularly) until they're at least 3. That's the reason why baby Einstine videos don't really work.
 

Ilikemuppets

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2005
Messages
15,138
Reaction score
25
I think parents need to realise kids aren't supposed to watch TV (regularly) until they're at least 3. That's the reason why baby Einstine videos don't really work.
Ugh... Tell me about it...:stick_out_tongue:
 

mikebennidict

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2004
Messages
3,700
Reaction score
7
Their 1 month olds won't sit still because Elmo's not all over it. The reason why they have to put those "warning lables" on the DVD's.

I think parents need to realise kids aren't supposed to watch TV (regularly) until they're at least 3.
And since when did we decide that?


I recall watching TV as far back as age 2.
 

Drtooth

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2002
Messages
31,717
Reaction score
6,710
And since when did we decide that?


I recall watching TV as far back as age 2.
A pediatric study suggests that tv can be beneficial, but only at age 3. The same study also debunked the effectiveness of the Baby Einstine videos.

That, and kids that young are too busy exploring the world around them to care about TV most of the time. There's nothing wrong with putting on a video to get loads of laundry and chores done, but it is NOT a substitute for parenting.
 

WAYMOND

Active Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2008
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
I agree that TV is not a substitute for parenting. I only allow my son to watch a small selection of tv shows. Mostly, he watches SS and other Muppet DVD's.
 

CensoredAlso

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Messages
13,453
Reaction score
2,291
A pediatric study suggests that tv can be beneficial, but only at age 3. The same study also debunked the effectiveness of the Baby Einstine videos.
Right, the studies are saying that TV before 3 is basically useless and could be harmful. One expert actually said having a 1 or 2 year old watch American Idol is better than Baby Einstein because it's less flashy stimulation.

Obviously we did watch TV when we were 1 or 2 and we didn't all go insane (Well...hehe). But I'm willing to agree with the experts that say it's just not helpful to development. Kids that age (and any age) really should be exploring their world. I know I watched way too much TV as a kid (including Sesame Street), and while I had a good time, I think I have grown a little too dependant on the background noise. And am a little too impatient when reading because I'm used to quick edit TV.

I think it's OK for kids to watch TV, but there really needs to be a balance. Kids need to get involved with other children and play outside and enjoy their world.
 
Top