It is a kids show, and it is not something a six year old could not watch, so it is a TV-Y, though if it were on Qubo, it might get a TV-Y7, becuase they rate most shows using those ratings.Ah. If that's the case, giving Muppet Babies a TV-Y7 was an oversight.
Maybe it's because I consider Muppet Babies a Kindergarten-second grade type show.
Is it me, or are people these days too sawwwwwwwns-i-taaaaaaahhhhhhve?Also, echoing Dr.Tooth's comment above, I agree and find it ridiculous that alot of shows on Cartoon Network are rated TV-PG.
You aren't wrong at all! People are way too sensitive nowadays, and it aggrivates me whenever someone tries to play the "victim" card and make you look like an ignorant jerk. Thanks Obama.Is it me, or are people these days too sawwwwwwwns-i-taaaaaaahhhhhhve?
(that's sensitive, by the way. I got the way of saying it from a Bugs Bunny cartoon called "A Lad In His Lamp," except I exaggerate it quite a bit).
I guess that would be a good idea. After all, Winnie-the-Pooh and Christmas Too was always given a TV-Y rating when it aired on ABC, and being a prime-time Christmas special, I thought that would have been worthy of a G-rating. I definitely could see the same with the new MB series.Okay, so here's something I've thought about. When Muppet Babies was broadcast on television in the United States, it was given the rating TV-Y, so parents would know that it was intended for young children. It definitely is child-appropriate, with starting the trend of young versions of famous characters and all. However, given that it's been around for a long time, and that several other Muppet productions are rated TV-G, should Muppet Babies ever be rated TV-G as well?
I think it should, even if it ever saw a return to American television in the future. It's been around long enough that I think people of all ages would enjoy it and not just kids. TV-G means it's intended for general audiences, so I think the show could fit, as the entire Muppet franchise was intended for both children and adults.