CensoredAlso
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2002
- Messages
- 13,453
- Reaction score
- 2,291
I can't really answer number one, since I have a higher opinion of the way the show used to be.
2. I have mixed feelings on this. On one hand, it's very true that kids pick up what they see on television through songs, repetition and familiar characters. Since so many kids watch TV, I think it does have a certain responsibility to be educational and send good messages.
Now on the other hand, I've read a lot about television and what it's able to do. Including the book, Amusing Ourselves to Death by Neil Postman (great book). Postman explains that television by its nature is primarily visual and primarily entertainment. Because it's visual, there are limits as to how much information it's able to get across. For instance, TV isn't great for too much exposition or the memorizing of dates. It's best at visual imagery, including colors and puppets.
In addition, Postman points out that TV education like Sesame Street is about rewards. If you learn from TV, you get flashy colors, puppets, songs etc. The reward is instant and fun. But that's not how real life school education is. Sometimes learning in life is hard and there's no way of making it easy or fun, and the reward isn't instant. TV education may give kids the impression learning must always be fun.
(I don't entirely agree with that last part, that kids may think all learning must be fun. It's true that some kids don't want to work hard if it's not easy or fun. But that's not all TV's fault. Plus, I think most kids do accept that school is important even when it's not fun.)
Not that Postman (or me) is putting down Sesame Street at all. TV education is good and effective up to a point. Just that it's good to be aware of its limits.
*Note, I'm mainly paraphrasing Neil Postman's book here so I wouldn't quote me on this. I'd look up his book if you're really interested. This is just if you're interested in looking into this further.
2. I have mixed feelings on this. On one hand, it's very true that kids pick up what they see on television through songs, repetition and familiar characters. Since so many kids watch TV, I think it does have a certain responsibility to be educational and send good messages.
Now on the other hand, I've read a lot about television and what it's able to do. Including the book, Amusing Ourselves to Death by Neil Postman (great book). Postman explains that television by its nature is primarily visual and primarily entertainment. Because it's visual, there are limits as to how much information it's able to get across. For instance, TV isn't great for too much exposition or the memorizing of dates. It's best at visual imagery, including colors and puppets.
In addition, Postman points out that TV education like Sesame Street is about rewards. If you learn from TV, you get flashy colors, puppets, songs etc. The reward is instant and fun. But that's not how real life school education is. Sometimes learning in life is hard and there's no way of making it easy or fun, and the reward isn't instant. TV education may give kids the impression learning must always be fun.
(I don't entirely agree with that last part, that kids may think all learning must be fun. It's true that some kids don't want to work hard if it's not easy or fun. But that's not all TV's fault. Plus, I think most kids do accept that school is important even when it's not fun.)
Not that Postman (or me) is putting down Sesame Street at all. TV education is good and effective up to a point. Just that it's good to be aware of its limits.
*Note, I'm mainly paraphrasing Neil Postman's book here so I wouldn't quote me on this. I'd look up his book if you're really interested. This is just if you're interested in looking into this further.