theprawncracker said:
I don't think OverUnderAround was saying that
I know exactly what he was saying. And silence can be interpreted any way you want. "The Muppeteers haven't spoken about this" doesn't, logically, point to any particular conclusion. It could mean they're for it, they're against it, they're on vacation, they've all just turned to mime, or even, that's just not their style. They've never publicly complained about anything before, not even
Telling Stories with Tomie dePaola. Why should their silence now be interpreted as significant?
But hey, if you're going to make assumptions based on silence, try this: If they were all for this policy, don't you think they'd be free to say so? Don't you think MHC would want to put them front and center and say, look, the Muppeteers support this?
But the real point is, even if I heard that Steve, Eric, Dave, Bill, Brian and even Jerry and Frank were in
favor of multiple Muppets, I would still be against the idea. It's a bad idea. It was a bad idea when Jim was alive, it was a bad idea when Jim's kids were in charge, it's a bad idea under Disney, and it'll still be a bad idea in 10 or 20 years' time. Two Statlers, three Waldorfs, eight Kermits, five and a half Chefs -- any combination of multiple Muppets is a bad idea. I don't care who inside MHC is for or against it, I just want it stopped. I've been absolutely 100% clear on this all along: We're not trying to save anybody's jobs, we're trying to save the Muppets.
also, how do we know that Yerrid and Massey have been hired as permanent performers of these characters?
We don't care! The whole point is that recasting for convenience inevitably hurts the characters. Every change, every swap, every new voice and new set of mannerisms takes the Muppets further away from who they are, and major decisions like that just shouldn't be taken lightly.
Kynan
savethemuppets.com