Kynan Barker
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2005
- Messages
- 93
- Reaction score
- 0
Craig Crane asked
These are guys with more invested in the characters than any of us, and yet they never commented when JHC was sold to the crazy Germans, or when a cheap Kermit replacement showed up on German TV, or when Ernie was recast for Play With Me Sesame. They're all things that each of us had strong views on, but the performers, who had more at stake than any of us, remained silent.
Part of that is just good business sense -- you can't run a company when your employees are running complaining to the media -- but I'd hazard a guess that it's also just not in their nature. Even under Jim's leadership, people had differing views, but a performer's job is to make the best of the situation and put everything they've got into the performance.
Consider also -- these guys are freelancers with families to feed and mortgages to pay. As far as I understand it, there's nothing contractually obliging Disney to keep the key Muppeteers on board period. So let's say Disney launched a plan to find understudies -- cheap, eager understudies -- I can think of a bunch of reasons why a freelancer with a lot to lose might not want to make a big song and dance.
Like I said, I can't speak for anyone but myself. My opinion is, Disney's plan stinks. Maybe I'm wrong, maybe Dave Goelz is hanging out for a suitable understudy to show up so he can finally let the blood flow back into his right hand. But I'm not going to take his, or anybody's, silence as a sign that everything's gonna be A-OK.
[Edited for mild language.]
None of us can speak for them, obviously, but at an educated guess, I think Craig's right -- I don't think the Muppeteers would want to see their characters farmed out. But I also don't think they'd necessarily speak out.about the Muppeteers.... do you think THEY would allow this to happen? You think Goelz and co would sit quiet...?
These are guys with more invested in the characters than any of us, and yet they never commented when JHC was sold to the crazy Germans, or when a cheap Kermit replacement showed up on German TV, or when Ernie was recast for Play With Me Sesame. They're all things that each of us had strong views on, but the performers, who had more at stake than any of us, remained silent.
Part of that is just good business sense -- you can't run a company when your employees are running complaining to the media -- but I'd hazard a guess that it's also just not in their nature. Even under Jim's leadership, people had differing views, but a performer's job is to make the best of the situation and put everything they've got into the performance.
Consider also -- these guys are freelancers with families to feed and mortgages to pay. As far as I understand it, there's nothing contractually obliging Disney to keep the key Muppeteers on board period. So let's say Disney launched a plan to find understudies -- cheap, eager understudies -- I can think of a bunch of reasons why a freelancer with a lot to lose might not want to make a big song and dance.
Like I said, I can't speak for anyone but myself. My opinion is, Disney's plan stinks. Maybe I'm wrong, maybe Dave Goelz is hanging out for a suitable understudy to show up so he can finally let the blood flow back into his right hand. But I'm not going to take his, or anybody's, silence as a sign that everything's gonna be A-OK.
[Edited for mild language.]