why are you watching Baby TV??!! and "watch" these kid shows all the time or talk about em?

weird!
Why is the fact a humongous Sesame Street/Mr. Rogers/Reading Rainbow/etc. also wanted to come up with a children's television program but couldn't get anything down together and would rather work on something for older children weird discussing how horrendous the slide in quality since Barney weird ?
I've never actually seen Baby TV or Pets TV, but still... babies shouldn't be watching TV, they're self sustaining. Anything that actually can walk around or move about may have to sit in front of something to keep them occupied if there's a phone call or there's a load of laundry or something. But they should never make or market programs as something kids that little will watch. Especially if it tells the gullible adults that they're kids will be geniuses upon watching.
As a Sesame Street fan on this board, you hear a LOT of complaints about how the show changed its tone to something more, as they say all too many times, "dumbed down." And the thing is, a lot of these fans don't look at the variables in the equation. The Journey to Ernie segment was Sesame Street trying to ape their version of Blues Clues and Dora for example. Thankfully, the writers came to their senses and revolted on that one. The problem with the show today is A) the fact the show has to clone these terrible for profit screaming toy commercials that don't really teach anything and B) the fact their demographic slowly slid from 4-6 (6 being at most in cases) to 2-4 when 2 year olds shouldn't be watching TV.
And above all, remember... Toddlers don't write shows for toddlers. They're written by people in their 30's, 40's, 50's... Dude manipulating Big Bird's old enough to be our grandfather and doesn't feel the least bit foolish. All those people actually studied other kids programming to prepare them to work on something for the same age group. What's strange about that? other than the fact my life goals completely fell through.