Everything turns on how things were written in Eisner's contract, and how they are written in Disney's company policy. In some companies, provisions allow shareholders to band together to oust individuals they feel no longer benefit their company in either fiscal or behavioral matters and sometimes both. Some company policies allow for shareholders to pressure and make vulnerable Boards of Directors, and some shareholders in some companies have the power to remove any or all Board members and replace them. Executives at such high levels always have buy-out clauses included in their hire contracts, not to be confused with the out clause. Like pre-nuptial agreements, these often are contested, with varying degrees of success, by the individual who is leaving. Eisner has a buy-out clause of X. Showbiz being what it is, chances are good he'll ask for more. Disney will not look kindly on this and the attorneys will all go at it. Disney will want him out with settlement based on his actual contract. Again, IF the shareholders have any power, they can throw their monkey wrench in and just hand him his hat and his previously-agreed-upon money. Roy Disney and his friend, I'm sorry, his name's not coming to me, the other guy who resigned with him, they are in constant contact with the Disney Board. So, we'll see what happens. It'll be quite interesting all around.