That really wasn't what that member was saying. It was more in defense of Dinsney Channel's bleh programming. And I'll say this one more thing before I put this to rest. I'm very disappointed that while Disney's preschool programing and animated programming have improved significantly, their live action shows have gotten (and I can't believe I'm saying this) worse. Disney Jr. has some great stuff like Miles from Tomorrowland, free from the influence of Dora, and darned if I'm still surprised that Gravity Falls is a Disney cartoon, rather than something on CN. But (really hate saying this) the sitcom shows (minus GMW) have sunk to worse than Hanna Montana levels. I mean, by comparison, these shows make that thing look like Taxi. Dog with a Blog sounds like one of those terrible ideas NBC would have greenlit in the 80's (and yes, the concept of blogs didn't exist back then, I know that, someone's going to passive aggressively point that out). On the bright side, unlike Hanna Montana, Disney isn't merchandising the heck out of these shows and shoving them down everyone's throats. They learned their lesson after no one was buying Johnas Brothers crap. Sucks that shows like Star vs. the Forces of Evil, Star Wars Rebels, and Penn Zero, while they do enjoy a once a week hour block on DC, got carted off to the less accessible Disney XD channel. I mean, for Glob's sake, force the cable congloms to give everyone both channels.I doubt the Muppet Show or any of the original Muppet films under Jim Henson would be considered G by today's standards and I think that's the point.
Done with that soapbox.
Jim really wasn't the kind to redo things, anyway. There was never a "Muppet Show 2," and that's why the first 3 movies were completely different (especially MTM). I don't think he would have wanted a Muppet Show retread. Even with the Muppet segments of JHH there was only so much TMS influence in there. I'm sure if the show got the longer run that it deserved, there would have been vast improvements to the format. Looking back, it did seem a little raw.Here is the thing, if they tried to just "re-do" the Muppet Show it would fail for a couple of reasons. Fist off it would fail because no matter how hard they would try it would never live up to how great the original show was. Secondly, I don't know how many people would watch. they would think that they had seen it before or something.
But so much of The Muppet Show is based in the 1970's. It managed to come out at the tail end of the Variety Show's relevance (there was such an incredible glut of terrible ones), yet managed to be just accessible and fun enough to push past that. MT failed by trying to take that format and update it. I don't see why they went with that weird Tonight Show type format instead of a more obvious SNL type. MT didn't really get off the ground until it showed less of the show and more of the characters. And I have to admit, while Roger Langridge brought back the Muppet Show in comic form beautifully, the comics really excelled in improving the show because of the lack of usable guest stars lead to some great character development. Scooter wanting to be a writer? That was excellent. He improved upon the formula.