Little late on this, but would this thread be complete without another reply to beaker?
>Hehe, well I was rising high on the Blair Witch assumption...so for awhile there was hope camcorder movies would make it big.
The Animal Game was sort of a spoof of that. I deliberately avoided watching Blair Witch before making it .... sort of wanting to make the shaky camcorder movie to end all shaky camcorder movies. A billion people shot bad films during that period, and it's a nice time capsule in that way ...
>Btw, you mention your films are 2+ hours, yet arent most indie comedies 90 minutes? hmmmm.
If I make a straight comedy, it usually comes in around 90 minutes ... Excaliburger at exactly that. Haven't done a straight feature comedy in a while though. Any longer pieces I do are usually hard to classify in terms of genre. I do whatever length is necessary to tell the story properly, and have spent four weeks shooting something which is released as five minutes long ... or one night shooting something which is released as 2.5 hours ... I call Gods of Los Angeles a romance. Others would have different words for it.
>Haven't seen. Actually you reference a lot of stuff I haven't seen<
well since the late 80's I have aggressively sought out virtually every type of cult, indie, experimental, foriegn, etc film.
I do this as well. But it seems you went in a different direction. I consider myself the king of the obscure reference. But still ...
>Aw, ok. For some reason I cant get any media stuff to work on here, but i'll take your word for it.
Bah. Watch the **** things online. Make it work. That goes to anyone, if you're interested at all. I provide a nice list of links earlier in the thread.
>Huge differences...really shows how much is altered in the editing process. A lot of small personal things I liked were altered, cut, or rearranged.
Give me a full further report on this. You've peaked my interest and I enjoy doing edit checks on films.
> Im surprised a lot of peopel dont like Toys, as after having seen 1500+ films so far(no joke, I keep a list!) that to me is the most astonishing from both a creative, directional, and cinematic perspective. The film captures everything I believe in and strive for.
Watched it when I was a kid and to me it was a train wreck. I might see it again after what you say, but .... hmm.
>click on 'Yahoo P...', contained there is a picture of me with Sweetums, some random art for my comic, and custom figures Ive done of Robin Williams(OHP), Al Roker, and other Muppet custom sunder my 'Muppet stuff' folder. Sadly, I dont have an online profile of all the stuff Ive done like writing, other art, etc.
Your bodies and concepts work together well ... your faces on the other hand look rather like shriveled rotten potatoes! Kind of kills the feel of it when they look like the Skeksis took their essence. Pepe probably works the best overall, as he doesn't suffer from that problem.
(Sculpting small is difficult ... Most action figure sculpts today are done large and then shrunk down via computer and mechanical means ... my father still has a couple of Muppet Babies sculpts done for a board game, these pretty good sized sculpts of gonzo and kermit, which were made very tiny in the actual game) ...
>My fave new young experimental filmaker has go to be Harmony Korine(Kids, Gummo, Julien-donkey Boy) brillaint stuff.
Haven't seen. My ex-girlfriend hated him ...
>>>I'm talking NO budget. There are a lot of people out there making movies with their camcorders. I've met several hundred of them, and a lot of them have talent. We will take over Hollywood someday.<<<
> Like a few takes, natural lighting...'Dogme 95' type stuff?
Uh, no. Dogma films are a bunch of people who think they're artists masturbating by shooting their films bad on purpose.
I'm talking about real amateur film ... honest films made by honest people. Who started out with nothing but a camcorder, a couple of friends to be actors, and a dream, and have pursued the craft of filmmaking as far as they can. People like Jason Santo (
www.mindscapepictures.com), Jay Bauman (
www.blancscreencinema.com), Mike Stoklasa (angelfire.com/movies/gmppictures) ... and me.
>>Well...for a lot of the visuals and set peices I have in mind...its like the brillaint Wochalskis, the guys behind the visionary Matrix trilogy. They need countless millions for their vision, so they started smaller to convince the studio at first.
But you'd be amazed how much you can accomplish for no money. And unless you've made a few hundred of those "small films", you'll never be able to convince anyone you're good enough to do a big one. Best to start now ...