My Last Thread About Copyright.
Well, the last one I’ll start, anyway.
Every time someone posts that he/she has a “Muppet replica” on e-Bay, the copyright issue comes up. And people feel pretty strongly both ways. Some have no problem with it and think it’s just great. Others feel the need to point out that it is copyright infringement, against the law and wrong.
Here’s what I think about it and why.
An individual pursuing a career in a creative field (writing, filmmaking, puppet building, song writing and performing, painting, comics etc.) has only his or her own original work on which to build that career. That original work has a high relative value to the artist.
Disney owns the copyrights to hundreds of original characters. The Muppet characters have an established value (since Disney bought the rights).
But which characters are more valuable? Bert and Ernie, Beeker and Janice? Or the characters that Swazzle has created? Or LabRat’s originals? Or Jarod Boucher’s originals?
I think they all have the same value in that they were created and built by someone for reasons specific to the creators’ intentions. Whether you agree or disagree with the ultimate result of those intentions doesn’t alter the fact that it is their right by law to do with them as they please.
Is it acceptable to infringe the copyrights of some and not others? Or would it be acceptable to make and sell “replicas” of the original puppets made by other members of this board? Once it becomes acceptable to infringe the copyrights of a large corporation, it isn’t a stretch to deciding it is acceptable to infringe the copyrights of an individual.
There are those that will make the argument that it isn’t my place to argue over copyrights that I don’t own and that if Disney or Sesame Workshop cared, they would pursue the matter themselves. And on a very basic level, that is true. On the other hand, since this is a message board for fans of the Muppets, I’d like to think we would all aspire to a higher level of respect for those that have created and continue to create something that we all admire so much.
One thing I certainly don’t understand is that there are people who participate on this board, who are skilled puppet builders and yet they spend their time making copies to sell rather than creating their own characters. I don’t think that is something to be complimented.
And one other question: If Jim Henson were still alive and owned the Muppets, would so many people be indifferent to and accepting of these “replicas”? Is that the type of person Jim Henson was?
Well, the last one I’ll start, anyway.
Every time someone posts that he/she has a “Muppet replica” on e-Bay, the copyright issue comes up. And people feel pretty strongly both ways. Some have no problem with it and think it’s just great. Others feel the need to point out that it is copyright infringement, against the law and wrong.
Here’s what I think about it and why.
An individual pursuing a career in a creative field (writing, filmmaking, puppet building, song writing and performing, painting, comics etc.) has only his or her own original work on which to build that career. That original work has a high relative value to the artist.
Disney owns the copyrights to hundreds of original characters. The Muppet characters have an established value (since Disney bought the rights).
But which characters are more valuable? Bert and Ernie, Beeker and Janice? Or the characters that Swazzle has created? Or LabRat’s originals? Or Jarod Boucher’s originals?
I think they all have the same value in that they were created and built by someone for reasons specific to the creators’ intentions. Whether you agree or disagree with the ultimate result of those intentions doesn’t alter the fact that it is their right by law to do with them as they please.
Is it acceptable to infringe the copyrights of some and not others? Or would it be acceptable to make and sell “replicas” of the original puppets made by other members of this board? Once it becomes acceptable to infringe the copyrights of a large corporation, it isn’t a stretch to deciding it is acceptable to infringe the copyrights of an individual.
There are those that will make the argument that it isn’t my place to argue over copyrights that I don’t own and that if Disney or Sesame Workshop cared, they would pursue the matter themselves. And on a very basic level, that is true. On the other hand, since this is a message board for fans of the Muppets, I’d like to think we would all aspire to a higher level of respect for those that have created and continue to create something that we all admire so much.
One thing I certainly don’t understand is that there are people who participate on this board, who are skilled puppet builders and yet they spend their time making copies to sell rather than creating their own characters. I don’t think that is something to be complimented.
And one other question: If Jim Henson were still alive and owned the Muppets, would so many people be indifferent to and accepting of these “replicas”? Is that the type of person Jim Henson was?