To be honest, I'm looking forward more to the Peabody movie. Being a fan of J. Ward's productions, I'm interested in seeing how this new movie will do in emulating the art style and writing of the original 50-year-old cartoons while trying to make it fresh and new. And to see how they can somehow stretch a 5 minute cartoon series to an hour-and-a-half long movie.
This movie has promise. If nothing else, it's ALL CGI, Peabody looks more or less like his own character (Sherman, however...). It's not going to be a miscast CGI/Live action hybrid. We've had too many of those, and the live action actors usually suck because they desperately don't want to be there (The Chipmunks/Yogi Bear... surprisingly not the Smurfs). Rocky and Bullwinkle could have been a better movie no doubt. The studio just about forced a female lead that just was
there. Both George of the Jungle films, despite playing around with the concept, were shockingly the most humor accurate of the group. Dudley Do-Right was a complete misfire. Only Alfred Molina and whoever the heck played Inspector Fenwick knew what they were supposed to do. Though I did like the line about "a grown man with an extensive Pokemon collection." Of course, that's kinda become a thing now, but at the time, it was unthinkable.
The plot line intrigues me. Essentially Sherman meets a girl, gets her lost in time, and they both have to go rescue her. Though the writers seem to forget that it's a what if machine, as the time space continuum gets screwed up. I kinda have faith in it being a Dreamworks film, even though the other offerings this year sound iffy. The Croods doesn't look too interesting, and I WISH they made the film with Aardman with the John Cleese script. Turbo I already complained about. That's a HUMONGOUS step back in the wrong direction. Shades of Sharktale no doubt.