First time poster here, and I'm getting sleepy so I hope that it makes sense. I just watched the SNL ep a couple of hours ago and I have to say that I am a little upset. Not so much that they made fun of Kermit (SNL does that to everybody). I'm upset because before the ghetto Kermit popped up I thought that it might actually be the real Kermit that was about to come out. I thought that maybe SNL and Henson might be capitalizing on Kermit's recent appearances on Kimmel and VH1, two more adult venues than the Muppets are more recently used to, and decided to bring him to the big daddy of late night. Also, the skit happened at around the same time as the second musical number usually does, so when I saw JT on the band set, I thought that this would be a straight music spot instead of a sketch. Needless to say, I felt a little deflated when the fake Kermit popped up and got ready for fun at Kermit's expense.
Also, I have a legal question concerning this sketch. We all know that SNL makes fun of all pop culture icons, but when they make fun of say George Bush or Sharon Osborne, they're making fun of real people who are part of public domain. Even though Kermit is a cultural icon, wouldn't SNL have to get permission to use his image (even though it was a faux Kermit) because he is a licensed character owned by the Henson company? This might not apply had it been some random green frog-like puppet, but since they directly stated that it was Kermit don't copyrights and licensing come into play? Also, since they sang over half the song, wouldn't they have to pay to use Rainbow Connection? I'm just wondering because no acknowledgements were made in the credits.
Anywho, sorry if this rambled, I was just wondering about those things.
Chicagogonzo