I'm confused. Since when do girls in the Sesame Street age target audience dress themselves?
I'm sure there are bad parents who would dress their children inappropriately just like there are bad parents intent on spoiling anything fun on Sesame Street.
HIGH FIVE!
Seriously. To think this will turn your kid into some sort of pervert or **** is the most offensive thing about this. And really... remember 5 years ago when 3 year olds were wearing Playboy bunny shirts, and bumping and grinding to all sorts of music and NO ONE batted an eye? That was the time to be outraged.
Seriously, I see NO social responsibility in pulling this segment. I only see kow towing and bowing down to a bunch of disorganized internet web whines, quite possibly from people who spend all their free time whining about videos for the sake of saying "Where's the imaginary outrage and the greedy corrupt wackos that pretend to make us feel safe?" They're doing this ONLY to prevent massive groups from writing letters to no body who really cares who only react because they're afraid of bad press. Imagine if SW bowed down this fast for having an integrated neighborhood in 1969. Besides, the freakin' ladybugs that were crawling on Elmo on today's episode looked EXACTLY like nips and no one filled up switch boards.
And we all have to get real here... SW made her wear a body stocking that not only covered her up, but even made it appear that she's not well endowed as it were. I'm pretty sure they DID indeed have screenings and debated among the crew saying "You think this is appropriate?" "I don't see all that wrong with it. She's wearing basically a flesh toned suit underneath there." No one complained then, no one spoke up, they all felt the four most naughty bits were covered up (not saying what they were). Least she wasn't wearing low rise jeans or pants down to the ankles (which I don't understand at all). Nor did she even show her belly button. Jasmine from Aladdin showed a LOT more, and cartoon or otherwise they DO make Jasmine costumes.
What I want to know is how many actual complaints did they really get before they chickened out last minute. Like what? 10? Bet the rest of it was just spam too.
Well with the Bryant case, it was well beyond established that Kobe's only crime was infidelity and cheating on his wife. The woman in question had concocted a scheme with her boyfriend the whole scheme, which was pretty much exhaustively proven. Not that celebs don't do such bad things.
With Pee Wee, to me that's a real tragedy. Pee Wee Herman was one of the most recognizable and best things about the 80's, yet because of one private incident that wasn't even really an incident his whole life and career was destroyed.
Y' see... South Park was right when they did the Michael Jackson episode. Some times they just wanna make these big time rich celebrities look like crooks to make themselves feel better about making a fifth of their daily paycheck in their lifetime.
Pee Wee? I'm glad he's back. There is NO greater feeling of happiness that he didn't kill the character in shame. Yet, I'm sure they keep hiring sex offenders with child porn to coach kiddy soccer games and NO ONE knows about it until it's too late. Then they wind up getting rehired. And I'm not even going to get into the Catholic priest scandal.
Again, she's wearing something that's not even all that worse from a Disney princess that SW argued her down to a body stocking that really constricts her figure. She did NOT show anything off, she did NOT bump and grind, she did not even appear in the segment with an actual child. Any of that and I'd fully agree. And I agree with whoever said it, I see some mothers wearing some PRETTY overly flattering attire. Especially married women who want to show it off. Something about that is WRONG.