As much as Elmo's over-saturation has "ruined"
Sesame Street for so many classic fans, you cannot put the blame on Elmo--or Kevin Clash--when kids are eating the stuff up.
As such, Elmo did
not deserve that parody, IMO.
(Sigh)...where to begin?
First up, it was just a
parody. It was meant to be
silly, to be a playful approach joking about the ridiculous way stores promote Christmas way too early. If this had been 1981, the tag would've gone on Miss Piggy's back. (Although the sales clerk would've been karate chopped). Other Muppets got the short end of the stick in this parody, too. (Poor Kermit!)
Second, the kids
are eating this stuff up because they
do see Elmo so much. Any toy store is guaranteed to have something featuring him. As we all know, Elmo is SW's (at first unintentional, yet now heavily promoted) cash cow. (On the opposite side of the coin, Abby Cadabby was designed to have merchandise made after her). To be fair, Rosie O'Donnell shares some of the blame (from 1996). Did Tickle Me Elmos cause chaos that Christmas? Yes. Was he scalped? Yes. Ten years later the whole thing happened again, only worse in some cases. This year, it'll be the same thing. To be fair, the blame could be also shared by whatever "Kamino branch" at SW decided to market yet
another wave of these things...
"And now to business. You will be delighted to hear we are on schedule. Two hundred thousand units are ready, with another million well on the way..."
"Ha ha hee hee ha..."
"Magnificent, aren't they?"
Can we blame Kevin Clash or Elmo for the kids eating this stuff up?
As for Elmo, from a design standpoint, yes. Elmo is bright red--a color that stands out bolder against the rest. (And psychologically makes people more alert at that. Children are especially receptive to this). Red gets a stronger reaction from people than any other color. Hence its use in STOP signs, etc.
Next up, Elmo is (often) loud. Yes, he can be sweet and quiet, but the loud laughing is what also catches kids' attention (and is what sells these dolls). By the same principle, the same attention-getting techniques apply to a fire truck, toy or real. It's red and loud too (not to mention grating on parents' nerves). It also catches kids' attention. When one screams by, kids run to the window to see it.
If circumstances permitted, Elmo might have kept his original, whispery, gravelly voice and later could have been hued the same blue as Maurice Monster. If Elmo wound up like that, there would be no Tickle Me Elmos on the shelves today. I'll retract that statement when "Tickle-Me-Maurices" hit the shelves.
Can Kevin Clash be blamed for kids eating this stuff up? Well...there was a SS documentary where a member of SW's personnel told him to "tone down on the laugh". He then responed with a "Look at all the Tickle Me Elmos that sold because of the laugh!" type of statement. If he didn't want Elmo to have so much exposure, he can have a say in at least some of the character's exposure onscreen and in merchandising. Certainly I would've after reading
this.
Remember, Kevin Clash
is Elmo.
Or he could take a completely different route by inventing a new character. Or even retire if he wanted to. I'm sure he's got enough dough. (After all, "Elmo gets paid by the Elmo").
But more Elmo exposure will happen (it has, actually, there's a 5 foot cardboard "Elmo Live" display at Toys R Us right now with pre-ordering slips). The chaos is going to happen again. Check eBay right when the new animatronic "Elmo Live" is released.
We now return you to our regularly scheduled topic of ridiculously early Christmas promotions and decorations.
I'm going to check out Macy's and Spencers Gifts to see what's going on there this weekend. So far, Macy's doesn't have their Christmas stuff up yet.
As for what Christmas is really all about, Robin put it very well when he told the Fraggles "That's when you gather together with the people you love and you wish each other peace on earth."
Well put, Robin.
Convincing John