mikebennidict
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2004
- Messages
- 3,700
- Reaction score
- 7
well i don't know why anyone before age 2 would watch any TV. no one can understand anything at that age.
Yeah, what's next? Sesame Street for fetuses and embryos?mikebennidict said:well i don't know why anyone before age 2 would watch any TV. no one can understand anything at that age.
Darn tootin! If mommies-to-be can put classical music up to their pregnant bellies then by golly, they can put recordings of Ernie and Cookie Monster up there, too!GeeBee said:Yeah, what's next? Sesame Street for fetuses and embryos?
un i think i understand very well. maybe i disagree a little bit about there's reasons for the changesDrtooth said:GelflingWaldo and Hays seem to be the only people who really understand the real story behind this. They really know how to put their thoughts into an unbiased fact-based answer.
Other than that, it's all the same angry fan rants about "Oh boy.. Elmo is dumb... where's some character that hasn't been on since the early 80's." I understand you, and I feel the same way... but keep this in mind...
IT'S A KID'S SHOW!!!!
So the question is, has Sesame Street lost its educational hold? Yes and No. Yes, as in they only have one letter and Number of the day, and they have what seems to be less of other things, but here's where the no comes in. Different ways of teaching different things. Times have changed, and as much as we all would like the classic episodes and skits to be used more, the sad truth is they can't. Kids like Elmo. He's more personal to them than Guy Smiley and such. And remember, kids like to see kids on TV over adults. Kids like to read books about kids. hense Harry Potter's popularity over... Scarlette O' Hara. Plus, they are teaching newer stuff, like More Spanish words than just uno, dos, tres, and Hola and Adios. They are teaching about different cultures in every episode via Global Grover. They didn't lose any educational value, just tweaked it.
Besides, I don't recall the SS characters talking about "Frustraited" until now.
Thanks, I guess all those college classes I took on education and teaching came in handy for something.Drtooth said:GelflingWaldo and Hays seem to be the only people who really understand the real story behind this. They really know how to put their thoughts into an unbiased fact-based answer.
With that logic you shouldn't talk to your children until they are able to understand you either. Watching TV/videos/movies is good for children (in moderation). You shouldn't stick them in front of the TV for 8-hours a day, but some TV is good; the sounds and images do stimulate growth and development of the brain. And it allows them to connect images, actions, sounds, events, and movement. You'd be surprise on how even at a very young age the human brain is able to comprehend alot more than many give it credit for.mikebennidict said:well i don't know why anyone before age 2 would watch any TV. no one can understand anything at that age.
GeeBee said:Don't shout Elmo-lovers, don't shout...
That's not what nostalgia's about...
But, if you cannot take...
The posts that we make...
Turn off your computer and pout.