I stifle to call this a "reboot" rather than what it really is. A soft re-imagining alternate timeline project to fill a hole left by the fact the third movie was in Development Purgatory for so long. I needn't repeat much, since it's all here in this thread if you're willing to go back and skim through it. I just have a feeling the only difference between the reception of this movie and the reception of the third movie we would have got is the anti-feminist wave of mansplaining.
The third movie, you see, was to have a plot
similar to that of Extreme Ghostbusters. A new class of Ghostbuster because the Ghostbuster gang is 30 years older, and to quote the
Transformers wiki "
Hudson is the only living Ghostbuster who isn't currently a doughboy. In fact, he's friggin'
ripped." And instead of an all woman cast, it would have had the
obvious comedians in that role, comedians like Seth Rogen and Jonah Hill who everyone hates anyway for some reason. To me, this soft, non-canonical alternate timeline stays perfectly away from being related to the original 2 films, rather than gambling with a direct continuation. Though, yeah, I really wish they went with a "Ghostbusters franchising themselves out" plot. Other than that, this movie shares a name, elements, maybe some of the iconic ghosts and the theme song. That's about it. If this is successful, maybe they're'll be a sequel. If it isn't, it's a one off. GB 3 is still somehow up to consideration (it'll still never be finished, though), so there's that.
That's why some of the backlash gets me. They didn't ruin a classic film series by making a sequel that everyone hates for some reason. They didn't go out of their way to hide the fact the original films exist
. They aren't even going to explain things that needn't be explained that wind up actually ruining the originals. This film is just...there.