fuzzygobo, why shouldn't people expect to see a reboot of Between the Lions?
A few reasons.
1) puppet shows are wildly expensive. Gotta build special sets, hire puppeteers, all this stuff that doesn't come cheap.
Government grants only go so far, then you need to rely on corporate sponsors. Towards the end of the show's run, Chick Fil-A was a sponsor. Not everyone may like their political alignment, so possible boycott.
2) In the hands of Christopher Cerf, he managed to crank out 130 episodes. They were all uniformly good. Even if they reassembled the whole cast and crew again, the bar has been set impossibly high, it would be disappointing if it fell below the standard set by the original.
In England there once was a BBC series called Fawlty Towers, starring John Cleese of Monty Python fame (he even guested on the Muppet Show).
Fawlty Towers lasted 2 seasons, one in 1975, one in 1979. Six episodes per season. Twelve episodes total. Ranked one of the finest British comedies ever.
John Cleese has been asked a lot over the years to produce another season, but he always refused. Those twelve episodes are untouchable. Expectations for another season would be so high, any shortcomings would be disastrous.
I'd worry the same with Between the Lions. Maybe Christopher Cerf could create a new show. Maybe the focus could be on reading. Maybe there can be some new puppet characters, but it wouldn't be the same show.
If it were up to me, I'd rather start from scratch instead of rehashing the past.
Case in point: "The Connors" ain't "Roseanne".
Was Gus autistic? That was never fully explained. The point wasn't to focus on if we was autistic or not, only that he wasn't as fast a reader as the others. But he was cute.