Changes that you actually liked

muppet maniac

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2002
Messages
1,352
Reaction score
452
like Zoe. She's a fun addition to the show and has a softer touch engaging the viewer than her more heavy-handed red friend. I haven't seen much Abby, but I feel she is meant to be marketed toward kids who like Dora the Explorer. Not sure how I feel about that, but the puppet translates beautifully into products (and balloons).

I like Telly. Yeah, he kinda started out creepy, but to me he's like a mixture of Boober Fraggle, Gonzo the Great, a bit of Snuffy's sympathetic demeanor and also an interesting monster in his own right.

I like that while the street appears tucked-away, it doesn't have the claustrophobic feel it began to acquire. I really feel the characters aren't as limited as to where they can go.
___________________________________________

Things I don't like:

Elmo. You know what they should do? Make Elmo's World an actual World experience. Send him everywhere to do kind of "Traveling Matt" sort of reports on the space outside of Sesame Street. This creates an actual reason for the segments other than empty viewing calories for the kids viewing him. It also keeps him off the street segments.

Because it's not just Elmo's world, it's also his street, his products and his Countdown to Christmas. Let's give him a one way ticket around the world so kids can actually learn something. Hey, maybe he can go to India and work for The Gap! Only kidding! I really see a good, healthy opportunity.

Another thing...I agree with the healthy eating habits thing, but with Cookie Monster? Come on! They should have found a better way to deal with that. What's next? The term "monster" is too scary for kids resulting in Cookie Monster being dubbed the Veggie Creature! You know, what they should have done is make a Veggie Creature cousin of Cookie's to show contrast.

Also, I miss Bert.


(Just thinking about all this for a moment).

Okay---

I honestly don't like Elmo, but I don't hate him either. But I DO know that it's the endless commercialism that I really can't stand. I mean, do we really need more "Tickle-Me' this and "Hokey Pokey" that and...Potty Time? What the What? Remember the big "Tickle-Me" craze years years ago? I remember it too, and even to this day, I think: Why? :attitude:

Okay, that being said, here's some of my other gripes about SS:

-The big change that started with the 36th Season, when they devoted a whole chunk (really, a whole BIG chunk of it) to healthy eating. Come on, it's "Sesame Street", not "The Nutrition Hour", or "Nutrition Street".

-Two words: Abby Cadabby.

And about the Cookie Monster thing: Long ago, rumors have been going around that the furry googly eyed fellow was going to give up his favorite foods for some healthier alternatives soon after a press kit for Season 36 was put up online, which mentioned the possibility of that sudden change happening, which was a song entitled "A Cookie Is a Sometimes Food"

Of course, if anyone's actually watched the whole season then, they would have seen that CM had been eating nothing but...COOKIES---and not a brocoli in sight. Plus the song was just a one-shot bit, and had nothing to do with the character being "changed". The overall lesson in this: don't listen to every rumor that's floating around the internet...unless you have a very good source.
 

wiley207

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 26, 2003
Messages
864
Reaction score
221
The way they were trying to put Abby Cadabby in each episodes as possible this season reminds me of how in Season 4 (1972) they were trying to put Count von Count in as many material as possible. Whether it was meeting other Muppets behind the brick wall, in his castle, and there was even a Muppet and Kid Moment with him and a Sesame Street News Flash featuring him, all in the same season! And NOW look at him!
 

bunny

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2005
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
The best addition is Little Murray Sparkles!
The worse...don't see him around much anymore!
 

Drtooth

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2002
Messages
31,717
Reaction score
6,706
Rewatching Old School vol 1 and starting vol 2, I remembered some other things I like not being around anymore.

Sketch Repetition- In the older episodes, a skit was shown 2 times (or more!) in an episode. Now, I know that it's supposed to mimick seeing the same commercial for the same product multiple times during a show, but to me, it's not fun to sit throught the same joke twice in one sitting. It's a nice little experiment, but it really throws off Comedy.

The old comedy duos- Yeah, they can be funny, and stu8ff. I liked Buddy and Jim... but they really seemed like a place filler (seemed like) for new muppet characters. I recall what one reviewer called the skit, a living Polish Joke (as that was written in the 70's, when people hated Poland for no apparent reason), and it really seemed like it. I didn't like Larry and Phyllis, however. One Grunting, and one making annoying high pitched Beeps...? I mean, I could care less to see subsequant ones. Plus, well.... Muppets are much funnier anyway.


Sketch Repetition- In the older episodes, a skit was shown 2 times (or more!) in an episode. Now, I know that it's supposed to mimick seeing the same commercial for the same product multiple times during a show, but to me, it's not fun to sit throught the same joke twice in one sitting. It's a nice little experiment, but it really throws off Comedy.

See what I mean? To do that joke justice, I would have had to make a double post, but I'll spare the moderators that one.
 

MJTaylor

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2004
Messages
312
Reaction score
12
Two changes I liked involved Snuffy finally being seen by the grown-ups. I too felt compassion for Big Bird when all the grown-ups failed to believe him when he was telling the truth. As DrTooth says, BB is more likable than Coyote or Dr. Bellows.
I also liked Around The Corner and was sorry to see it go. It went the same time Elmo's World started. IMHO, SS jumped the shark at that point, but I feel the last season is the best they have done for quite a while so maybe it has jumped back.
 

Drtooth

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2002
Messages
31,717
Reaction score
6,706
To me, around the corner was basically the struggling to find a voice when multiple talents either passed on or left the show. Even Dave Golez was a part of that period briefly, to fill the gaps the some of the performers left behind. By the time Elmo became popular, and EW started up, they found their voice and moved to a more classic sense (classical, meaning they focused on the main street). A lot of what went down related to the fact that they had trouble coming up with newer characters that would stick. Once they got Elmo-centric, they gave up on most of the Furry Arms characters.
 

wiley207

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 26, 2003
Messages
864
Reaction score
221
Once they got Elmo-centric, they gave up on most of the Furry Arms characters.
The only Furry Arms character that survived was Benny Rabbit. But that might be because he debuted in 1991, two years before "Around the Corner" came along. He wasn't even a bellhop then, but his personality, complete with "Don't call me Bunny! The name's Benny!" was there back in 1991. I recall seeing Benny in the "Elmo's World" segment about Hats, and he and a bunch of look-alikes were in a "Trash Gordon" skit.
 

Drtooth

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2002
Messages
31,717
Reaction score
6,706
The only Furry Arms character that survived was Benny Rabbit. But that might be because he debuted in 1991, two years before "Around the Corner" came along. He wasn't even a bellhop then, but his personality, complete with "Don't call me Bunny! The name's Benny!" was there back in 1991. I recall seeing Benny in the "Elmo's World" segment about Hats, and he and a bunch of look-alikes were in a "Trash Gordon" skit.
Natasha, humphry and Ingrid seemed to come in and out some times. Actually, not so much Ingrid, but 2 seasons back, Humphry was an anchor for Monster on the Spot news.
 

Convincing John

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2003
Messages
1,243
Reaction score
195
What do you guys think about (seriously) sending Elmo on a trip around the world...
Hey, I'm all for that as long as it's by plane.

(Walks into cargo hold and picks up a caged crate with the label MONSTER)

Me: "All out for Groom Lake, Nevada!"
Elmo: "Oh, yaaaaay! Elmo's plane is landing!"
Me: "The plane? No, the plane lands on Sesame Street." (pulls open door and grabs crate) "You land in Nevada!"
Elmo: "AAAAAhhhhhhhhh!"

A factor that has very little to say, but says it in third person and very loud and high-pitched. I like the little guy, but isn't the Elmo-centered Sesame over yet? I like seeing him all quiet on the stairs in the background of Muppet Family Christmas! He's much cuter that way. :wink:
I remember something Frank Oz said once about the Muppets in general. People asked why and how the Muppets just got so popular. To papraphrase Frank "Honestly, I don't know, nobody does. Otherwise everyone would be doing it."

Any character, really can have their sweet moments. I didn't mind Elmo at all in MFC, or even in his earlier Sesame years when he was like the "little kid on the block" trying to catch up with the older "kids".

Elmo supporters on another website I've read say that Elmo is not just a repeating, one-note, permanently happy, giggling thing. 'Just look at that sketch he did on hair and skin with Whoopi Goldberg!'

True. I've seen the sketch, and in this context, Elmo works. It's a cute little three minute bit and I like it:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cINhHw8YAO4

There's a lot teaching kids in this bit:
--differences between hair and fur
--what skin is
--how any kind of skin can be pretty
--self acceptance and pride (I like my hair and my skin)
--(and as always with Sesame) people and monsters who look different can be friends

And perhaps this sketch's strongest attribute:

This bit doesn't talk down to kids. It explains the material intelligently and simple enough for kids to get, yet doesn't talk down to them.

But this is just one sketch. Just one. Yeah, there are some more Elmo bits out there that are chock full of lessons, a little humor and supported by good writing, talent, and even sometimes a celebrity (as seen here).

I've seen Elmo's World (try to) teach the concept of "skin". It takes 20 minutes to cover the same material Elmo and Whoopi covered in 3 minutes. Heck, there was more substance in the clip you just saw than in so much of what Elmo's World is.

Can someone please tell me what kids learn from "let's ask a baby?" Professionals behind the show are so conscious of showing only educational material and no "filler bits" like seen here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OcxsrTJ2Dhg

And yet "let's ask a baby", "the ___ song" (Jingle Bells) and the "Mr./Mr./Ms. Noodle" segments that seem like sped-up versions of Buddy and Jim appear daily...and weekly...and monthly without end.

Elmo's World could work just as well with an expertly designed environment that engages kids and inspires them. Not with a sloppily drawn background, but a believable, yet surreal sense of imagination. Could SW do this and have it work? Yep. In fact it's been done.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-xWdKPgitXE

Yet again, another Elmo segment that blows "Elmo's World" out of the water with ten times the substance, educational value and fun. It can work when SW wants it to.

So, to say what I like so far about this season, I would say it would be any piece of material that still has that...power. there have been some. Any song, any performance from any character that can be done in such a short length of time, get a point or lesson across, engage the children without talking down to them, and dare I say make the adults laugh, too.

It's older than this season, but I really liked "Meal or No Meal". Oh, and Gordon getting run over by an elephant. I used to be a teacher and I can sympathize with him. That's how the kids acted when school got out on Fidays!:batty:

Convincing John
 
Top