frogboy4
Inactive Member
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2002
- Messages
- 10,080
- Reaction score
- 358
I get ya. The fact is - digital film will always look different. It's like watercolors and oils. They just exist on different principles. What I find interesting about your statement is that film theorists have stated that the hypnotic flicker of standard film projection grabs the viewer's attention much more than the smooth, continuous stream of digital. Digital doesn't have the virtually invisible black frames between film frames. Some remark that it's part of the magic of film.Originally posted by GWGumby
But the ultimate point is I don't want to remember that I'm sitting in a theater when I'm watching a film except for laughter and audience reaction (note: not audience distraction) I only want to experience the film.
Digital really isn't that bad, it has room for improvement and it will always have more of a limited range from dark to light. Video (which is what digital film really is) has always been a high contrast medium.
There really is room for all types of projection. Just as different movies use different film stock for mood, directors, not movie theaters, should be the ones to decide if a film is shot traditionally or digitally. A time and place for everything.