Buck-Beaver
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2002
- Messages
- 4,174
- Reaction score
- 162
Oh yes, of course artists are concerned with technique. And just because someone works in what is traditionally considered a "craft" doesn't mean they can't be artistic or an artists. It's just that traditionally craft focuses on process while art focuses on concept. The distinction is mostly academic and most people don't know or care what the difference is anyways.On the contrary, an artist needs to be concerned with technique, to develop their technique, in order to successfully convey the idea behind what they are creating. Da Vinci wasn't concerned with technique? Michelangelo wasn't concerned with technique?
When I was writing my last post I was thinking about Ronnie Burkett. His making of marionettes is traditionally defined as a craft, but at the same time you can't say that Ronnie Burkett's overall work isn't art. So he uses a craft (marionettes) as a means to an artistic end (a theatrical performance). He's an artist, but the marionette building he does is a craft. I'm not suggesting that working at a craft or using craft techniques means you're not an artist!
There are lots of people who fall in to both categories and the line between the two has become very blurred. I think you're right about "crafter/craftsman" having a negative connotation Stacey and I think it is because so many bad sock monkeys & plastic-canvas doll houses get sold at church fairs. People hear "craft" and they think of activities like making something with Popsicle sticks and construction paper and that's not what the word is actually supposed to mean.