Search results

Not a perfect example, but it does show that the basic characters can be successful in a TV show besides TMS.

Well, The Muppet Babies cartoon lasted for 8 years.

Well, I know one thing for sure. None of our opinions here is going to make any difference in Disney's decision to do a TV show or not.

Nah, I say go for a TV show now when everything is fresh and new.

Yes. What you said was speculation. What another member said was accusation. Still, there is no basis in reality for either.

The idea exists only in people's imagination. If someone made unfounded accusations like that against Steve, they'd get called a troll.

In any case, a new try at a Muppet TV program would be great. It shouldn't be discouraged just because its success might make Matt's performance appear better. Let's give it a try.

The success or failure of a show can have many reasons. Writing is one, the performers are another, and there is also the aspect of what's going on behind the scenes. If there is constant in-fighting, it's bound to affect the process. A new performer and a new start just might help.

Actually, I never even said anything against Steve this time around. I only said that Matt might make a new Muppet TV show a success and should be given a chance.

Look! He was paid off! Here's proof! Where did this money come from?? Oh, wait...this might have been a few years before Steve got fired...

:rolleyes:

That's it. It must be a joke. He really had me thinking he believed it for a minute. Good one on me. Lol

Do you hear yourself talking, my friend? You've accused me of working for Disney, you've accused me of being Matt Vogel. You've accused the Hensons of being bribed by Disney, and apparently you think that anyone with finances had to be bribed. Is Steve really so important that he justifies a...

At least people are just stating their opinions about Steve. You're making up conspiracy theories about the Hensons and stating them as if they were facts. Again, show me the proof.

Show me proof that the Henson kids were paid to say it. That statement is just outright irresponsible.

I thought Jim intended for the Muppets to be edgy. And didn't Frank say that they worked best that way?

And all the conflict behind the scenes?

Tell you what, if there is a new Muppet Show, you can choose not to watch it. I'll watch it and enjoy it.

It's all a matter of opinion. To me, blind faith in Steve is as stupid and wrong as one can get.

This time we have Matt as Kermit though. I think a new TV show is worth trying.