Search results

Could the creator of this message explain the part of it I had embolden?

"Conversations in Broadcasting" (transcripts of TV programs either related to news or entertainment and lifestyles for certain TV stations)

Here is a hyperlink to a certain other World Wide Web site with a recording of a certain other discussion of profanity: https://wgnradio.com/2018/05/09/what-does-profanity-reveal-about-our-emotional-lives/

I had found the recording (or audio) at this address after selecting a certain part of it that appeared to have had text of "DOWNLOAD": http://media.wwl.com/device/signup/a/99090435/11-12-angela-hill-210pm-cussing.htm? (note: I had found the discussion to had been very interesting and worthy...

Using vulgar language to express personal feelings is not necessary for any being.

Had you ever been surprised by such words and phrases in certain interviews? For example, I was surprised to hear a recording of whom I had assumed was a certain performer of a certain character named Beakman for a certain TV program named "Beakman's World" named Paul Zaloom saying a certain...

I was able to access programming from the service named BUZZR at the following address for the one named Pluto TV (note: in case you get redirected to a different stream of video, you might still be able to access the one for the service named BUZZR if your Internet browser has a function some...

I would prefer using the words "their selves" over the word "theirselves" in certain sentences.* (*another opinion that might not be considered "popular")

I suggest that you let other beings speak for their selves as to whether they were referencing the phrase you had mentioned or not.

What did you mean by "we're"?

That was not the phrase I was referencing.

I had never liked that combination of letters after having read of their having been used as a shorten form of profanity in recent times.

Thank you for the responses.

Could you also tell me which "PBS affiliate" you were referencing?

Were you referencing the documentary that was being discussed here earlier?

In case this message was made in reference to this discussion, I would say that it had become a more open one.

I did not intend on typing "to chance" in my previous message (I would correct it if I could). It was most likely a typographical error (I would had considered that possibility if I were in your position). As for the end to my previous message, I was referencing the times in which I had only...

I had planned on seeing it through a local TV station long before joining this discussion.

I would only get to chance to see it in its entirety if I were able to do so (note: as of this writing, I am in no position to do so).

In case the author of this message was referencing the movie mentioned here earlier, I would say I would hope to discuss it here if I were to have had the chance to see it in its entirety.