I think that if Disney owned Fraggle Rock, there would be a lot more merchandise (plushes, shirts, etc.), though it's very easy to have more stuff than is out now. I don't actually know what they would have done with the project itself, because it's tough to say what commercial influences would have made them do with it. Perhaps they would have made a cartoon, perhaps a full-fledged revival of the show, it's tough to say. But I think they would at least of had the common sense to market everything better.
It depends. There's a long list of stuff Disney owns that it frankly seems like they don't even realize they own. I've been on this soap box before, but that includes a LOT of Saban/Fox kids programming they got due to the buyout of Fox Family. And while Saban did purchase back the rights to all the live action shows (mainly for Power Rangers, but that includes everything.. even the live action TMNT series), Disney still owns the cartoon series... even anime dubs (which is why Hakushan Daimao's big fat Genie character couldn't be in the US version of Tatsunoko vs Capcom). But of course, they do nothing with it... yet, they're not in a hurry to pull them all down from Youtube. Which means we may never see a legal release of Eek the Cat in the foreseeable future, as well as the rest of
The Tickseries of the 1990's.
Sure, we have to realize how lucky we've been in the Muppets department since about 2008, that they're actually acknowledging them (just not to the extent we want, other than a feature film we thought we'd never see). If anything, I'd say Fraggle Rock could be treated as the
other Muppet thing they own. We'd probably get backing for the movie... but I wonder how much else we'd see. Kermit is more instantly recognizable than Gobo, after all. And it isn't like Disney's burning to do anything with the other Muppet license they own, Bear in the Big Blue House...