CensoredAlso
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2002
- Messages
- 13,453
- Reaction score
- 2,291
I'd be happy with leaving the Middle East to do as it wants to do, as long as its leaders don't violate human rights. On that issue, I am not at all confident.
Indeed. It's not like WW-era Germany, where it's one little douchebag with an inferiority complex mad 'cause he flunked out of art school. There hasn't been peace in the Middle East since the serpent tempted A&E, LOL. I recognize someone might say this is stereotypical and racist, but the fact is, history proves that region is just one big fight. They must like it, as they never have ANY intention to stop. You could most likely make them all super rich with nary a care in the world, and they'll find something to fight about. I really don't think we can play games with them with the rules we're used to using. They operate on a whole 'nutha level.I have to agree with this. The Middle East hornets nest is thousands of years old. It's literally Biblical!
Well um, the oppressors like it. The victims not so much. There's obviously some desire for change if Egypt is any indication. But the people who genuinely want freedom and democracy continually get overtaken by the fundamentalist religious groups. It's often that way in revolutions; the most violent mobs end up taking over. People are held hostage by fear, both of dictators and of the extreme religious sects.They must like it, as they never have ANY intention to stop.
Exactly. I'd like to say WWII was fought out of some supreme sense of humanity, but the world was scared as heck of the tentacles of Nazi Germany reaching their shores. If we're going to impose civil human rights through aggressive war then why don't we add China and Africa to the list of countries to invade? The answer is that we do what we can. American companies have entire departments dedicated to overseeing conditions in Chinese factories and most of the civilized world cracks down on conflict diamonds. It's not enough. It's all there is. I'm certain the US presence in the Middle East will radically decrease once we finally ween ourselves off oil. There are so many problems to fix here in the states too. Does that mean we don't do anything? Of course not. It just means we are limited in our options and none of them can solve the issues of human rights in the Middle East, China and Africa. That change must come from the people rising up against their oppressors. Once enough of them do that then foreign support makes sense. And, of course we must be invited! We have yet to see that happen.Indeed. It's not like WW-era Germany... They operate on a whole 'nutha level.
Actually we have done it, by taking steps to eliminate poverty. We did it with the wave of European immigrants in the working class. As the children were given more opportunities for education and employment, many were able to move on from poverty and the potential for violence. The problem now is that the same opportunities aren't being offered to the working class today.We also want to say, we can solve gang violence...We can't.
And what would motivate the kids to do that exactly? They're living in fear as much as their elders. And they're learning from their elders, so just because they grow up doesn't mean they're going to make their own individual decisions. They're going to see themselves living in poverty and become just as bitter and angry as their parents.just let the kids grow up, make their own decisions, and stop listening to the bitter hateful elders who are absolutely controlled by fear and living miserably.