Okay Mupp, I'm sorry that a post that expresses my true opinion seems to have upset you for some reason (but I'm not sorry for the opinion itself). However I do feel the need to ask you to chill a little and there are a few things I must point out to you....
Inanimate objects with life. That works great in animation.
We were originally discussing on this thread of a movie where toys come to life. My issue with Cars isn't that cars are alive, after all on paper the idea of toys coming to life when kids aren't around may seem just as silly, yet I LOVED all three Toy Story movies and put them on the same level I do as the Muppets and believe me that's a HUGE level. Cars just doesn't measure up for me like all three Toy Story movies, Monsters Inc, Incredibles, Wall-E and Up.
It may not be the most liked Pixar film, but it has been very successful for Disney and Pixar, and the 12-acre Cars Land will be opening in Disney California Adventure in 2012.
I NEVER said Cars wasn't successful. In fact in that very post of mine in which you quoted I stated that Cars has made Disney Pixar a LOT of money and that includes in terms of box office and HUGELY thanks to toys and other merchasdise.
And quite frankly I have noticed something, whenever people say that Cars is their least favorite Pixar film, they NEVER explain why.
Do people even have a reason? Or do they just hate talking cars?
Again in that very post of mine of which you quoted, I IN FACT DID GIVE A REASON. I said that it just doesn't hold up like the rest of the Pixar movies do in my opinion. That's a reason, but if you want me to go into more detail I shall. For one thing, the characters in Cars just aren't as appealing to me as the ones in Toy Story. Lighting McQueen isn't as great of a hero as Woody or Buzz is in my opinion and to be honest, I found Mater's act to get a bit old. Which could also bring to me to my next point, I didn't enjoy the voice acting like I did in Toy Story, I felt a bit of chemisty was lacking there.
And as for those "script problems" with Cars 2, as I have explained in the past, it has been reported that they are taking the time to fix those problems. Isn't that a good thing?
At the D23 Expo, John Lasseter explained that the film will not only be funny, but it will have heart as well.
Nobody said that them taking the time to fix whatever "script problems" wasn't a good thing. Also I didn't say that Cars 2 nor the first Cars didn't have any "heart," but I will say that it doesn't, again as I feel, as much heart as every other Pixar flim.
I'm willing to give Cars 2 a chance, especially after hearing that they are working to fix the story problems. Not every company is willing to take the time to do that.
Sorry if I seem hyper, but I've just had enough of the hating on Cars. It was a good film, as are all Pixar films.
It did what all Pixar films do, it takes audiences into a world that they have never seen before.
I'm willing to give Cars 2 a chance as well, it's just not as much of a "I godda see this movie as fast as possible" for me like Toy Story 3 was. When I said it "doesn't seem like much" I didn't mean for that to be taken as it seems like a bad movie as you have, just perhaps that it will be okay, again please read my original post cause I did say I'm sure it will be "pretty good" again just as I felt about the first Cars, but from most other Pixar movies, especially the Toy Story Trilogy are more than "pretty good" there downright amazing.
Look Mupp, overall I actually did enjoy Cars, I really did, thought it was a decent movie. I just feel that compare to the other Pixar movies it doesn't have that "magic" that the rest do, but that doesn't mean nor did I ever say I "hate Cars." I just feel it doesn't "measure up" like the rest do and again this is just my opinion.