frogboy4
Inactive Member
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2002
- Messages
- 10,080
- Reaction score
- 358
Superhero Pictures
Super hero and comic book films go through cycles of popularity. They're hot again now and that's not a bad thing. Some are better films than others.
Sony owns cinematic Spider-Man as long as they keep releasing films in a certain time-frame; otherwise the movie rights revert back to Marvel/Disney. It's a business decision and a no-brainer. The reason for the reboot...well, that's Hollywood these days. It's turning into the old studio system.
The game has changed for actors since the success of Harry Potter and now Twilight. Studios can build franchises by signing unknowns to long contracts. Gone are the days of the Toby Maguire paycheck to play Peter Parker when they can hire a younger actor for a fraction of the price for six or more movies. I just hope the quality will be there.
"Kick-A.ss" is a good film and great adaptation from the source material. But then there's "Iron Man 2" that fell very short of the spark, connection and fun of the original. It's like watching a video game with great stars in it. But soon we'll have the great Joss Whedon directing the "Avengers" the same summer that the third "Batman" installment comes out from Christopher Nolan.
Sure, "The Dark Knight" deserves every bit of over-hype it received. The craftsmanship, story, art direction, performances and respect for the source material all came together in a superbly balanced way that kicks the butt of any lopsided style-over-substance superhero film from Burton, Singer or Raimi (as good as some are). I'm not much of a joiner and I'm nobody's sycophant so it comes from an honest and researched place when I say "The Dark Knight" is one of the greatest crime motion pictures ever made.
Personally, I'm looking forward to the possibilities with "The Green Lantern". Most of that's probably going to take place in outer space with other aliens so that's a change of pace. Plus Ryan Reynolds...'nuff said.
Super hero and comic book films go through cycles of popularity. They're hot again now and that's not a bad thing. Some are better films than others.
Sony owns cinematic Spider-Man as long as they keep releasing films in a certain time-frame; otherwise the movie rights revert back to Marvel/Disney. It's a business decision and a no-brainer. The reason for the reboot...well, that's Hollywood these days. It's turning into the old studio system.
The game has changed for actors since the success of Harry Potter and now Twilight. Studios can build franchises by signing unknowns to long contracts. Gone are the days of the Toby Maguire paycheck to play Peter Parker when they can hire a younger actor for a fraction of the price for six or more movies. I just hope the quality will be there.
"Kick-A.ss" is a good film and great adaptation from the source material. But then there's "Iron Man 2" that fell very short of the spark, connection and fun of the original. It's like watching a video game with great stars in it. But soon we'll have the great Joss Whedon directing the "Avengers" the same summer that the third "Batman" installment comes out from Christopher Nolan.
Sure, "The Dark Knight" deserves every bit of over-hype it received. The craftsmanship, story, art direction, performances and respect for the source material all came together in a superbly balanced way that kicks the butt of any lopsided style-over-substance superhero film from Burton, Singer or Raimi (as good as some are). I'm not much of a joiner and I'm nobody's sycophant so it comes from an honest and researched place when I say "The Dark Knight" is one of the greatest crime motion pictures ever made.
Personally, I'm looking forward to the possibilities with "The Green Lantern". Most of that's probably going to take place in outer space with other aliens so that's a change of pace. Plus Ryan Reynolds...'nuff said.