Mayhem Mini Figures for sale on eBay

The Count

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 12, 2002
Messages
31,288
Reaction score
2,940
Hmm... What about the Four Horsemen? Don't trust MacFarlin, they'd end up as killer accurate sculpts, but with extremely limited to no functional articulation. Though I love my Muppets figure collection at the scale they were made and my counting characters—which features some monster Muppets like the Count and Fughetta Faffner, and others based on my Muppet figures like the Banshee (Janice) and the Headless Horseman (Ernie)—will be, once drawn, hopefully made into PVC's just a bit taller than the Palisades Minis; I have come around to at least appreciating Beaker's viewpoint of a multi-teared multicharacter Star Wars like Muppet Universe line of smaller PVC's. It would have given us the main Muppets, but also stuff that Palisades mentioned might not have done well or even schemed to possibly release if the line had continued. A TMS Season 1 group with Mildred, George the Janitor, Hilda, Nigel, Boppity, and Gloat. An MTI group with Captain Smollet and Bad Polly, Benjamina, Squire Trelawney, Mr. Samuel Arrow, Clueless Morgan, and Cabin Boys Gonzo and Rizzo. An MT group of Spamela, Johnny, Sal, Pepe and Seymour, Bobo, and Bill the Bubble Guy. Stuff like that would've been extra awesome.
 

beaker

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2002
Messages
7,761
Reaction score
858
I'm actually in the toy shop now. I'm looking at a wall of them and I have to be honest - I've always thought many of the classic Star Wars figures sculpt jobs bit. However I do like the scale amd type of figures they are.

The Palisades minis were a little too textured, limited and pricey than they should have been. It is my feeling that such size sculpts with limited articulation at an SRP of $8.99 could do quite well.

Integrity of likeness is important to me, but that doesn't require all the texture and puppet-perfect likeness. Cartoon representations are fine with me as long as it's an attractive interpretation. Most cartoon-looking versions are made so due to laziness rather than style choice. Going through licensing stock art you kind of pick up why choices were made, what companies are quality and what companies are hacks.

In the action figure world right now the best sculptures are from McFarlane, NECA and Mezco. Those are the ones I'd want handling the Muppets. The worst are really the standard Hasbro and Mattel companies that are testaments to the idea that mediocrity sells.
It's funny, because I *love* the standard Hasbro, Toy Biz, ect.
styles. I don't need detailed to almost grotesque proportion 8"
heavy figures I don't even have room for. When the Mcfarlane Standard changed the entire collector and figure market in 1997, it was good...but I also am glad for the Playmates, Hasbro and Toy Biz' out there for making stylish affordable kids figures the way they oughta be made. I guess I never grew up, but I love my not so detailed 3 3/4-4" figures, ******:smile:
 

beaker

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2002
Messages
7,761
Reaction score
858
I have come around to at least appreciating Beaker's viewpoint of a multi-teared multicharacter Star Wars like Muppet Universe line of smaller PVC's. It would have given us the main Muppets, but also stuff that Palisades mentioned might not have done well or even schemed to possibly release if the line had continued. A TMS Season 1 group with Mildred, George the Janitor, Hilda, Nigel, Boppity, and Gloat. An MTI group with Captain Smollet and Bad Polly, Benjamina, Squire Trelawney, Mr. Samuel Arrow, Clueless Morgan, and Cabin Boys Gonzo and Rizzo. An MT group of Spamela, Johnny, Sal, Pepe and Seymour, Bobo, and Bill the Bubble Guy. Stuff like that would've been extra awesome.
Yes! Multi-teared and multicharactered. Good description. I remember seeing the original Fisher Price Muppet action figures in stores in the early 80's, and imagined wave after wave. Even at 3, 4 and 5 years old, I was a pretty rabid Muppet/Sesame collector. Going with my mom to thrift stores, garage sales, stores looking for anything Jim Henson related.
 

frogboy4

Inactive Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2002
Messages
10,080
Reaction score
358
It's funny, because I *love* the standard Hasbro, Toy Biz, ect.
styles. I don't need detailed to almost grotesque proportion 8"
heavy figures I don't even have room for. When the Mcfarlane Standard changed the entire collector and figure market in 1997, it was good...but I also am glad for the Playmates, Hasbro and Toy Biz' out there for making stylish affordable kids figures the way they oughta be made. I guess I never grew up, but I love my not so detailed 3 3/4-4" figures, ******:smile:
It appears that you favor the nostagia aspect over actual quality and I understand that. I just can't support that personally.

Again...it's not about the scale, lack of texture or limited articulation. It's the likenesses that really bite on those. There's very little artistry that actually goes into their products and that bothers me as an artist. Hasbro and Mattel are like McDonalds when my palette desires something finer with a bit more thought involved.

I’d be fine with Muppet toys of the same size and scale of the Star Wars classic line but the likeness couldn’t be the same watered down quality for my dollar. Honestly, if those toys didn’t bear the SW label they’d have to step up their game to sell them for another property. Just because the box informs the customer the figure is a representation of a particular character doesn't make it so. I actually expect a good resemblance, not just a passable one.

I work several days a week in a shop that sells the Star Wars toys and even their most avid fans have to read the labels for some of the characters to decipher who they are. That’s ridiculous and as a fan it's just not good enough for me or the Muppets. They deserve quality sculpts not cynical kiddie fodder. It's not that Hasbro can't make the character likenesses better in their same style, it's that they just don't care because Star Wars fans will buy them anyway. Muppet fans are more particular. :wink:
 

Drtooth

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2002
Messages
31,717
Reaction score
6,706
Off topic, but I don't think Hasbro isn't so much about sculpts as good business sense. They were a company who in 2002 or so was on the verge of crashing, and about to lay off hundreds of workers, but they were able to pull themselves out of the dirt with the Star Wars episode 3 line. And since then, things have been getting better and better, what with the newfound interest in Transformers and their acquisition of the Marvel comics license. Plus, we mustn't forget that companies like MacFarline, Mezco, etc don't make toys for children, but rather collectors that want bigger and better sculpts. Though, MacFarline toys really lost me as soon as they started making large, fragile plastic statuette scenes and calling them action figures. So, for affordable, decent quality kid's toys, Hasbro is the company.

Mattel still struggles with its lack of quality and over inflated prices... add to it the lead paint scare that really affected them negatively, and the fact they're still reeling from the Bratz toys stealing Barbie's thunder (even though they finally got a court order to have them taken off shelves... too little, too late) they're not quite where they need to be. Their acquisition of the DC license may just pull their butts out of the fire.
 

Quesal

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2008
Messages
743
Reaction score
32
With these prices, I'll just enjoy the plushies I have of the Mayhem and admire all video and DVD I can get of them.
 

beaker

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2002
Messages
7,761
Reaction score
858
It appears that you favor the nostagia aspect over actual quality and I understand that. I just can't support that personally.

Again...it's not about the scale, lack of texture or limited articulation. It's the likenesses that really bite on those. There's very little artistry that actually goes into their products and that bothers me as an artist. Hasbro and Mattel are like McDonalds when my palette desires something finer with a bit more thought involved.

I’d be fine with Muppet toys of the same size and scale of the Star Wars classic line but the likeness couldn’t be the same watered down quality for my dollar. Honestly, if those toys didn’t bear the SW label they’d have to step up their game to sell them for another property. Just because the box informs the customer the figure is a representation of a particular character doesn't make it so. I actually expect a good resemblance, not just a passable one.

I work several days a week in a shop that sells the Star Wars toys and even their most avid fans have to read the labels for some of the characters to decipher who they are. That’s ridiculous and as a fan it's just not good enough for me or the Muppets. They deserve quality sculpts not cynical kiddie fodder. It's not that Hasbro can't make the character likenesses better in their same style, it's that they just don't care because Star Wars fans will buy them anyway. Muppet fans are more particular. :wink:
What toy store is that in San Francisco? I swear I cant find any non chain toy stores in SF anymore. (shame what happened to the Metreon too)
 

beaker

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2002
Messages
7,761
Reaction score
858
Off topic, but I don't think Hasbro isn't so much about sculpts as good business sense. They were a company who in 2002 or so was on the verge of crashing, and about to lay off hundreds of workers, but they were able to pull themselves out of the dirt with the Star Wars episode 3 line. And since then, things have been getting better and better, what with the newfound interest in Transformers and their acquisition of the Marvel comics license. Plus, we mustn't forget that companies like MacFarline, Mezco, etc don't make toys for children, but rather collectors that want bigger and better sculpts. Though, MacFarline toys really lost me as soon as they started making large, fragile plastic statuette scenes and calling them action figures. So, for affordable, decent quality kid's toys, Hasbro is the company.

Mattel still struggles with its lack of quality and over inflated prices... add to it the lead paint scare that really affected them negatively, and the fact they're still reeling from the Bratz toys stealing Barbie's thunder (even though they finally got a court order to have them taken off shelves... too little, too late) they're not quite where they need to be. Their acquisition of the DC license may just pull their butts out of the fire.
I'm noticing a HUGE influence by designer/hong kong urban vinyl/kid robot style figures with mainstream kids toys(like the new Batman animated series figures, or the big muggs like Star Wars and Marvel figures(
 

frogboy4

Inactive Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2002
Messages
10,080
Reaction score
358
What toy store is that in San Francisco? I swear I cant find any non chain toy stores in SF anymore. (shame what happened to the Metreon too)

I'm noticing a HUGE influence by designer/hong kong urban vinyl/kid robot style figures with mainstream kids toys(like the new Batman animated series figures, or the big muggs like Star Wars and Marvel figures).
I think it was mentioned somewhere around here before that I work several hours a week at Action Figure Freddy across and down the street from the Metreon. The store has been there for three years and does fairly well.

The new "Batman: The Brave and the Bold" action figures are based on the cartoon's style (but I wouldn't be surprised if that style was created in that pseudo-Asian-influenced style to sell toys).

The Mighty Muggs are very popular. They are inspired facsimiles of other Japanese urban vinyl sculptures and have their own inspired facsimiles too. These include Munny, Monskey, Dunnies and even the I.W.G figures.

I really do like all types of toys as long as decisions are made based on quality instead of only cost. I still believe Hasbro and Mattel to be the greatest cynical offenders in that category. I like their style, limited articulation and basic materials but not the cheap quality of their sculpts and paint aps. Figures don't have to be either cheap chotchkies or huge obsessively detailed sculptures. The quality I expect is fairly reasonable.
 

turkishproverb

Active Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2008
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
I really do like all types of toys as long as decisions are made based on quality instead of only cost. I still believe Hasbro and Mattel to be the greatest cynical offenders in that category. I like their style, limited articulation and basic materials but not the cheap quality of their sculpts and paint aps. Figures don't have to be either cheap chotchkies or huge obsessively detailed sculptures. The quality I expect is fairly reasonable.
Not by a long shot. Modern Playmates is the worst offender, with the ninja turtles line. The reason all the figures out since the movie were based on it was because they were too cheap to do molds for the new show.
 
Top