Honestly, I think nanco does a so-so job. Sometimes their products are pretty good. I think most of their Muppets (including Sesame Street) looked pretty good. I really liked their Heathcliff line, even though I was NEVER able to win one.
And some of the Fraggles look alright. But the only Wembly and Boober look good. I give them credit for the Doozers and Uncle Matt
I will say, their Family Guy ones look better than Kelltoys (I hated Peter's gold rimmed glasses).
Too bad you have to spend hundreds of dollars worth of Tokens to get them, though.
EDIT:
And seriously, about Sababa plush? They clearly lost the license years ago. Mokey wasn't made do to lack of retailer interest. I've seen Target sell out of everyone but Red.
Oh, that Wembley was not only a poor representation it was ugly. I had two of their Fraggle items in my hand and - UGLY! Maybe other characters were good, but certainly not the Wembley. Ugh.
I will admit their Swedish Chef is cute and some of the dressed up smaller versions of Kermit are fun. In the past they made a nice Bunsen and Beaker ripped off from Igel's design. And were the company I remember ever releasing a Pepe. I will give them that credit, but their Fozzie, Miss Piggy and Gonzo are absolutely hideous. Their Statler and Waldorf repeat similar mistakes of other companies. Their Kermit and Animal are passable for carnival toys.
As far Sababa. I guess we were spoiled by Palisades in getting swift straight answers from a company. They were a smaller company with limited resources picked up the Fraggle license because nobody else was doing it. Why won't companies understand that leaving out a crucial member of a set is a bad idea? The Mayhem needs Floyd as the Fraggles need Mokey. As fans we are not "entitled" to have them make these items, but when these guys are the only ones with a particular license it is possible for them to incorrectly sour the market due to a discrepancy such as an omission and have other companies believe a product line didn't shine due to lack of interest. That incorrect idea is already attached to the Fraggle brand.
I'll tell you why there's no Mokey. 2 to 4 slots make up a series and she was the odd Fraggle out. I think there was an assortment from another company in the 80s where Boober got the shaft. Also female characters can be slightly harder to market, but I don't think that would be so in this case. I can see Sababa favoring a Matt before Mokey, but I heard both prototypes were made.
I would have gone for a second wave of Fraggle plushes that included Matt, Sprocket, Mokey and possibly a little (out of proportion) Jr Gorg to fill out the fourth slot. I'm sure Junior would have been enough of a hit with Fraggle fans no matter what the size. I hope the future holds more comprehensive solid Fraggle product. The initial small Sababa Fraggles are the best plush representations I have ever seen on the market.
Those are just my ideas on the Fraggle merchandise. Every time I see Wembley on my partner's shelf (he's a bit of a wembler) I just have to pick him up. I'm amazed at the likeness - as a designer and a fan.