I agree. I loved Cars, but it seemed a bit too pop for Pixar (yet not pop enough for a Dreamworks film). And there are some thing I just didn't like... the use of pre-existing music for one.I think “Wall-E” is one of the rare films that can bridge the generational divide. I personally hope it performs better than “Cars”. I know it's getting a sequel and it is a beautiful film (all Pixar films are beautiful) but it's one of my least favorites. I did, however, like the theme that - winning at any cost isn't really winning - and believe it to be a valuable and timely message to the conservative element of the NASCAR crowd. I'll stop there with the philosophical and political analysis, but I do believe that was intentional and I did notice.
Personally, I always took the film to be semi anti-Mass consumerist. The whole point of the film for me was that this once thriving town became a ghost town due to the inclusion of a highway, all the while small businesses went belly up. Something similar, mind you, to small businesses crumbling due to the mass market stores like Wal Mart for its conviniance and cheaper prices.
Basically, I came away with the moral, what's easiest and fastest isn't usually the best, and to take things slowly.
But I digress.
I wonder how the audiences will warm up to the fact that, in the post apocoliptic future, mankind now weighs 300 pounds, and has trouble moving. NOT due to nutritinal reasons, mind you. The fact that robots do everything for them, AND the fact Earth's off it's rotation or something and they have a higher gravity (I forget what the exact semantics were).