ElecMayhem
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2002
- Messages
- 342
- Reaction score
- 30
Okay seriously, this is my last post for the weekend. I need to get away from this for a bit. But I feel there are a number of things wrong with your comments Ignohippo
Not that I am defending the sock nose... I am not. In this instance, I agree with the online community at large. But that's my other point is that you say you cannot believe that we would proceed with something so far off. Well, I have explained (like five times) -- it was this route, or nothing. Believe me, we tried many, many other options. We failed. Sorry.
While I appreciate your praise personally, and your defense of the company, weren't you yourself knocking us in the previous paragraph? Not trying to be smart about it, but your post seems to contradict itself. Seriously though, I appreciate that you appreciate my being here.
But you're wrong on Miss Piggy. She does not sell well. Ask Any Muppet licensor from the past ten years, or even the Henson company. It's this weird societal thing where women don't like being associated with pigs (which, apparently was not such a big deal in the 70s?) and since she is a lady pig, she is not as appealing to either men or women. (I am probably not explaining this well... I am tired... but we had a huge discussion about it with the Henson people back at Palisades... Miss Piggy = peg warmer, and not just for action figures... I know the apparel licensees had a **** of a time moving anything with the Divine Swine...)
Anyway, everyone have a great weekend.
T
Firstly, you mention the negative reaction from the fans at toy Fair, which I concede is true. But if there's one thing I've learned in this industry, it's the difference between listening to your consumers, and to listening to a die-hard vocal minority online. Case in point, with Star Wars "everybody" online was dying for a Qui-Gon Jinn lightsaber. We thought it was a slam dunk. So we put it out, and sold like, 7.I agree with you Jamie 100%. The thing that has bothered me the most about Animal and Gonzo is that they're just so darned close – just a little more tweaking would have made them almost as good as Terry's protos. While Gonzo may look WAY off, Jamie's PS fixes show how close he really could have been.
The nose problem is even more frustrating because the reaction to it was unanimously negative when it was shown at ToyFair. The idea that MR never listened to the people who actually were buying their product is completely beyond me. Never in a million years did I think they would actually proceed with something that was that far off.
Not that I am defending the sock nose... I am not. In this instance, I agree with the online community at large. But that's my other point is that you say you cannot believe that we would proceed with something so far off. Well, I have explained (like five times) -- it was this route, or nothing. Believe me, we tried many, many other options. We failed. Sorry.
Couple things wrong here. Fozzie is not ready to go up for pre-order. If he did, it COULD be Gonzo all over again, with people complaining that the pics we post don't look like the product.I'm very thankful to Travis for posting pics and I hope the reaction here on the boards don't dampen his enthusiasm for showing us these products before they hit the streets. This stinks! It's terrible knocking a company who is working to get us something as fantastic as a Muppet replica. Sadly, Animal and Gonzo just aren't close enough IMO to be considered "replicas" and sell to anyone besides the die-hards. I sincerely hope they hit Fozzie dead-on and that they post pics and get the pre-order started IMMEDIATELY. Otherwise, I'm afraid Gonzo is going to kill this line (let's face it, Animal really doesn't look enough like Animal out of the box to fly off shelves either). Unfortunately, I can't imagine more than a handful of people are going to buy Gonzo considering how much he costs and how (sorry, honestly) bad he looks.
While I appreciate your praise personally, and your defense of the company, weren't you yourself knocking us in the previous paragraph? Not trying to be smart about it, but your post seems to contradict itself. Seriously though, I appreciate that you appreciate my being here.
Even if Gonzo sells poorly, I will be pushing for Fozzie, and I've already explained why to the big whigs at MR. (Why Gonzo might not sell, I mean...)My sincerest hope is that the good folks at MR can see the deficiencies in Gonzo and won't allow his poor sales numbers to affect the future of the line. It was a shame that Palisades saw the numbers of the terrible original Piggy figure and then made the conclusion that Missy Piggy doesn't sell (while PIS Piggy was awesome, they packaged it with a $30 playset so they never had any idea how well she would have sold separately).
But you're wrong on Miss Piggy. She does not sell well. Ask Any Muppet licensor from the past ten years, or even the Henson company. It's this weird societal thing where women don't like being associated with pigs (which, apparently was not such a big deal in the 70s?) and since she is a lady pig, she is not as appealing to either men or women. (I am probably not explaining this well... I am tired... but we had a huge discussion about it with the Henson people back at Palisades... Miss Piggy = peg warmer, and not just for action figures... I know the apparel licensees had a **** of a time moving anything with the Divine Swine...)
Anyway, everyone have a great weekend.
T