I think I said it wrong. Between the two, Carvey was the one who did more impressions, was goofier overall, had the longer tenure on SNL, and was probably the one who the public expected to be a star after SNL. Could anyone have predicted the success that Myers has had post-SNL?
I was comparing this to how Cook was arguably the funnier of Cook & Moore, and people probably expected more from Cook's career than Moore's. Ditto the two from "Bosom Buddies"- who back then thought Tom Hanks would become the star he is today? Ditto Lenny & Squiggy- people thought David L. Lander was funnier than Michael McKean, but McKean went on to do "This is Spinal Tap" and nearly every Christopher Guest picture.
Of course, I wasn't around at the time (or at least not old enough to understand) so I don't know for sure.
David "Gorgon Heap" Ebersole
Comedian Stephen Fry once said Peter Cook was "the funniest man who ever drew breath."
Although they reunited several times in the 1970s and 1980s, Moore decided to stay in the States and pursue a Hollywood career shortly after Cook & Moore's Broadway show closed. One of Moore's first Hollywood movies was the Chevy Chase/Goldie Hawn comedy-thriller
Foul Play. Then he was cast in
10 with Bo Derek, followed by
Arthur, which cemented his Hollywood fame. BTW, John Belushi was actually offered the part of the perpetually-drunk Arthur, but he wanted to break away from playing characters who overindulged.
Watching SNL in the late 1980s and early 1990s, it
did seem as if Dana Carvey would be the breakout star, along with Jon Lovitz.
And Tom Hanks?
Aside from
Bosom Buddies, he had a small role in a low-budget slasher flick,
He Knows You're Alone. He also guest-starred on a couple of episodes of
Family Ties, as Meredith Baxter's troubled brother. The lead in
Splash was originally meant for John Candy, but director Ron Howard thought Candy would be funnier as the brother of the lead.
BTW, Hanks's
Bosom Buddies co-star was Peter Scolari.