The most DATED thing on classic Sesame Street?

Larxene

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2006
Messages
195
Reaction score
1
I'd say the most dated thing (besides Maria) is the attitude of the show itself.

1. Kids are encouraged to be kids instead of rushed towards adult things (the target audience was also a broader age range, I've noticed these days one is expected to be grown up by 12 :frown: )

2. They aren't talked down to by the characters (who actually sometimes go over the kids heads, recalling ADULTS are likely watching with their kids and deserve to also be entertained)

3. There's absolutely no commercalization ie characters created JUST to sell toys (I don't think there were Sesame Street toys until the mid-70's. I know my mom had to make me plushies and blankies, they did not exist in stores!)
 

ISNorden

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2006
Messages
1,294
Reaction score
54
I'd say the most dated thing (besides Maria) is the attitude of the show itself.

1. Kids are encouraged to be kids instead of rushed towards adult things (the target audience was also a broader age range, I've noticed these days one is expected to be grown up by 12 :frown: )

2. They aren't talked down to by the characters (who actually sometimes go over the kids heads, recalling ADULTS are likely watching with their kids and deserve to also be entertained)

3. There's absolutely no commercalization ie characters created JUST to sell toys (I don't think there were Sesame Street toys until the mid-70's. I know my mom had to make me plushies and blankies, they did not exist in stores!)
Amen. The attitude on today's Sesame Street seems to waver between "dumbing down" and "kids are little adults"; you'd never see those approaches on an older episode. Whatever happened to respecting kids' intelligence and curiosity, and letting them have real childhoods? Why did Sesame Workshop quit encouraging parents to watch along, not just dump kids in front of a TV?

As for commercializing, even Elmo and the recent fairy-tale imports were never "created JUST to sell toys"; the commercialism on today's Sesame Street seems to work the other way round. ("Let's get as many licensing deals as we can to slap characters' pictures on ANYTHING parents might buy for a pre-schooler, whether the tie-in is logical or not.") Still, I wish Sesame Street didn't have to rely on corporate sponsors and product tie-ins as much as it does now: if producers didn't need to worry about their budgets so often, then today's Sesame Street might look more like yesterday's.
 

MeWantCookie

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2006
Messages
154
Reaction score
6
I remember reading somewhere that Elmo's World basically became the focal point of the show because studies had shown that the number of SS viewers under the age of three had increased by a lot and their interest in the show was waning after the program was 3/4 over. Maybe they should do a study focusing on parents (or babysitters, older siblings, etc.) and see how long their interest in the show lasts after watching a prolonged segment of "Elmo's World!"
 

ISNorden

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2006
Messages
1,294
Reaction score
54
Good point, Dana: if the Workshop knew that such young kids would lose interest after 45 minutes, why didn't they just cut the show's duration (and let EW stand on its own)? That seems like the easiest way to solve the problem.
 

Larxene

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2006
Messages
195
Reaction score
1
When did it become the standard to plop kids in front of the TV and use it as a babysitter anyhow? My mom use to watch Sesame Street with me and I doubt very much I sat still and paid attention for the entire hour. That's an adult concept, young kids don't sit still and be quiet for that long! Kids will wander off, play with their toys, dance with the songs..etc etc. Any show that keeps a kid hypnotised like a zombie is bad news anyhow., it means they aren't thinking or imagining and that isn't good for them. (Says the woman with no kids, heh)

You know what else is missing? Classic Sesame Street really had an inner city, multi-cultural feel. You got the feeling Sesame Street wasn't a rich or perfect place but that it was home to a lot of different folks of different backgrounds.

As for merchandising... UGH. See, all I had were Sesame Street plushies (when they existed), records and that Little People playset. I didn't need Tickle Me Singing Dancing Hula Hooping Counting Spelling Tenth Anniversay Elmo with Elmo bedsheets, curtains, bath wipes and toilet paper.
 

Drtooth

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2002
Messages
31,717
Reaction score
6,710
As for merchandising... UGH. See, all I had were Sesame Street plushies (when they existed), records and that Little People playset. I didn't need Tickle Me Singing Dancing Hula Hooping Counting Spelling Tenth Anniversay Elmo with Elmo bedsheets, curtains, bath wipes and toilet paper.
Kids don't need Ipods, Xboxes, their own computers either. At least SW is making some money off these things to work on their projects. If we all forget the commerical kid's show first appereared in 1991, and it starred an obnoxious purple dinosuar. Since then, children's television has slid into a bottomless pit of crap. That's why it has become a baby sitter. Not only SS, but cartoons and children's TV have suffered totally due to these negligent soccer mom types that don't know how to raise kids. Heck, there are a group of people who ignore all the pediatric reports and still think Baby Einstine garbage works.

I would say Classic SS fans would make terrible scientists, as they only observe the constant, not the variables. The problem with a show that changes with the times is the times themselves change. We have annoying things like "play dates" now. What is that?

I could get on a whole thing about this, but we've discussed it way too much. Expecting SS to be the same quality it has been for 38 straight years is like expecting Dan Akroyd and Jane Curtain to still be on SNL and the Simpsons writers to do hillarious well thought out original storylines.

However, I will say they are clearly going in a direction where they're trying to change things back. They experimented with 2 episodes without Elmo's world (the first 2 in almost 10 years), and they cut several of the segments the fans hated. They're on the road to see if changing things back is a good option, and let's hope it works.
 

MeWantCookie

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2006
Messages
154
Reaction score
6
Yeah, I feel like the recent shift of focus from appreciating diversity to combating childhood obesity has abandoned some important things kids need to know about their outside environment...whatever happened to Tarah? She grew up and probably moved on to bigger and better things, but she was placed there to teach kids to accept handicapped/disabled individuals. Same with Linda being deaf.

Classic Sesame Street really had an inner city, multi-cultural feel. You got the feeling Sesame Street wasn't a rich or perfect place but that it was home to a lot of different folks of different backgrounds.
That was the SS my mom used to watch with the kids for whom she babysat in the '70s, and once my younger brother and I came along, it became her favorite show and she even used to watch it while she was cooking or folding laundry. That's the SS they need to bring back.
 

Drtooth

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2002
Messages
31,717
Reaction score
6,710
Yeah, I feel like the recent shift of focus from appreciating diversity to combating childhood obesity has abandoned some important things kids need to know about their outside environment...whatever happened to Tarah? She grew up and probably moved on to bigger and better things, but she was placed there to teach kids to accept handicapped/disabled individuals. Same with Linda being deaf.
Does anyone else watch anything besides SS besides me? It wasn't just SS. Every bloody show and commerical had to shoehorn something in about obesity to try to combat the fact that there are fat people. The kids shows at least had some taste to it. Special K is still selling it's wretchid cereal by scaring women into thinking that if they actually eat a waffle at a restaraunt every so often, they'll become 900 pound shut ins the next day. But that's enough of that. People should already know how to be healthy. It's all about choice. A lot of things were abandoned for that. SS already did a good job with healthy foods, and they could have had a softer focus on the subject. but you know what they say, several pounds of fevered prevention is worth an ounce of cure.

But I think that everytime they put a disabled character in now, they have to pretty much bus one in. Linda was natural. We need someone natural, and not a character that's just about "a person in a wheelchair can be normal" and then pretty much do nothing but talk about how they're in a wheel chair.

They did a real good job with Traction Jackson. Half the time, I can't even tell he's in a wheel chair. He's that natural. We need a human character like that on SS.

I spoke my peace about Children's TV in gerneral in this post

I think that it's time to move this conversation to this thread, because we're all getting off topic.
 

ISNorden

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2006
Messages
1,294
Reaction score
54
Does anyone else watch anything besides SS besides me? It wasn't just SS. Every bloody show and commerical had to shoehorn something in about obesity to try to combat the fact that there are fat people. The kids' shows at least had some taste to it. Special K is still selling its wretched cereal by scaring women into thinking that if they actually eat a waffle at a restaurant every so often, they'll become 900-pound shut-ins the next day. But that's enough of that. People should already know how to be healthy. It's all about choice. A lot of things were abandoned for that. SS already did a good job with healthy foods, and they could have had a softer focus on the subject. But you know what they say--several pounds of fevered prevention is worth an ounce of cure.
Goodness knows I am sick and tired of seeing ads for exercise programs, diet pills, and mega-healthy low-everything food whenever I watch network TV...not to mention the public service announcements during kidvid time, which demonize ANY food with sugar, fat, or meat in it. Obesity may be a common health problem in the US, but it's high time the media stopped treating obesity like the only health problem (especially when kids are involved).

To bring this back on topic...Sesame Street didn't need to emphasize "Healthy Habits for Life" over two whole seasons. They could have done without most of the new health/nutrition material, and simply redone older sketches on those topics. (Heck, even a remake of "Captain Vegetable" would've taught more than that awful "Fruit/Veggie Dance" did. And why couldn't someone have filmed new live-action clips of playing/dancing children, instead of coming up with "It's Time to Play" in Season 37?)


But I think that everytime they put a disabled character in now, they have to pretty much bus one in. Linda was natural. We need someone natural, and not a character that's just about "a person in a wheelchair can be normal" and then pretty much do nothing but talk about how they're in a wheelchair.

They did a real good job with Traction Jackson. Half the time, I can't even tell he's in a wheelchair. He's that natural. We need a human character like that on SS.
As a real-life disabled fan of Sesame Street--all I can say is "Hear, hear!" One of the things I liked about Linda (during her run on the show) was that she had a disability but didn't let it define her. Not every sketch with Linda in it taught about hearing problems or sign language...just as not every sketch with Maria and Luis in it taught about Spanish words or Latino culture. Sometimes those traits came up in the script, sometimes not...the same way it happens in real life. Traction Jackson is a decent attempt to show disabled kids in that light, but I worry that he might become a parody of what he's meant to teach.
 

Drtooth

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2002
Messages
31,717
Reaction score
6,710
To bring this back on topic...Sesame Street didn't need to emphasize "Healthy Habits for Life" over two whole seasons. They could have done without most of the new health/nutrition material, and simply redone older sketches on those topics. (Heck, even a remake of "Captain Vegetable" would've taught more than that awful "Fruit/Veggie Dance" did. And why couldn't someone have filmed new live-action clips of playing/dancing children, instead of coming up with "It's Time to Play" in Season 37?)

I have no idea why the heck those were considered learning about healthy foods. They had nothing to do with anything, and it didn't even want to make kids get up and dance, just change the channel. That was just a cheap thing they filmed in a day that they could re-dub and make it look like 2 skits. No nutricional value. I have no problem with putting the root problems of obesity behind a curtain and just telling kids what to eat, but a couple skits here and there, and the Cookie is a Sometimes food skit were enough.
 
Top