Reevz1977
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2007
- Messages
- 1,138
- Reaction score
- 374
My opinion (for what it's worth)*, the movie was absolutely dire. It was an embarrassment to watch and to the franchise. I know, like everything in life, as many people will love it as loathe it, but for me I fall definitely in the latter. The humour was not clever...at all, the visuals were awful and it just came across as an unfunny spoof. The trailers were awful but the actual movie managed to be worse!! I also never thought I'd write this, but one of the most terrible aspects was Bill Murray, who is my hero!!
I don't have any problems with the gender-swap aspect, though admit that element was clearly a gimmick purely designed to be controversial, and I am a Paul Feig fan with only Bridesmaids being on my "meh" list. It was just an awful, awful, movie and definitely a movie that really did not need to be made. I would personally put Ghostbusters in the list, alongside Back to the future, Indiana Jones, Star Wars, Jaws, ET... of movies that should not be remade. Ghostbusters II has, for years, been given a hugely rough ride by "critics", but the one thing "Ghostbusters 2016" has done, is make Ghostbusters II look like an absolute masterpiece!
I am sad what the terrible box-office returns and audience reception means for the future of the Ghostbusters brand. It has survived for over 30 years with a very successful merchandise range which the fanbase has lapped up and supported it, but I can't help but think this movie AND the horrible reaction Sony had to fans (not the "misogynists") who were angered by the remake, I think a lot of goodwill towards the franchise may well have withered.
Again, just my opinion, but Ghostbusters has been my favourite movie for over thirty years and I am quite passionate and disappointed by everything that has happened to it since the loss of Harold Ramis, which was tragically the catalyst for where it stands now.
To draw comparisons with this and my Muppet obsession - I currently feel about Ghostbusters like I did about the Muppets after Studio DC...*shudder*
*I expect the usual suspects on this forum to shoot me down for the audacity of having an opinion that differs to theirs, but so be it.
I don't have any problems with the gender-swap aspect, though admit that element was clearly a gimmick purely designed to be controversial, and I am a Paul Feig fan with only Bridesmaids being on my "meh" list. It was just an awful, awful, movie and definitely a movie that really did not need to be made. I would personally put Ghostbusters in the list, alongside Back to the future, Indiana Jones, Star Wars, Jaws, ET... of movies that should not be remade. Ghostbusters II has, for years, been given a hugely rough ride by "critics", but the one thing "Ghostbusters 2016" has done, is make Ghostbusters II look like an absolute masterpiece!
I am sad what the terrible box-office returns and audience reception means for the future of the Ghostbusters brand. It has survived for over 30 years with a very successful merchandise range which the fanbase has lapped up and supported it, but I can't help but think this movie AND the horrible reaction Sony had to fans (not the "misogynists") who were angered by the remake, I think a lot of goodwill towards the franchise may well have withered.
Again, just my opinion, but Ghostbusters has been my favourite movie for over thirty years and I am quite passionate and disappointed by everything that has happened to it since the loss of Harold Ramis, which was tragically the catalyst for where it stands now.
To draw comparisons with this and my Muppet obsession - I currently feel about Ghostbusters like I did about the Muppets after Studio DC...*shudder*
*I expect the usual suspects on this forum to shoot me down for the audacity of having an opinion that differs to theirs, but so be it.
Last edited: