I'm mixed about the humor myself. But then again, trailers. To be perfectly honest, I don't think we really need another Ghostbusters movie of any kind. Maybe a DTV animated one with the original surviving cartoon voice cast (which means we'd get Coulier as he's still around and Music sadly isn't). All and all, I'd agree with the opinion that the film is unnecessary, rather than this being some big controversial thing that fanboys are whining all over. Still, the plot has piqued my interest. If only they had that plotline rather than "creepy painting wants to kidnap a baby." The cartoon would have made it work, the second film seems like a lost opportunity.A fanbase is going to have a reasonable amount of hate for any project they get, this is not a reasonable amount of hate, the Youtube trailer has double the dislikes than likes, and I can't help but agree with them. Trying not to look like a whiny fanboy, but there's no reason for me to watch this movie, the humor just doesn't look good, it looks just like any poorly written Melissa Mccarthy flick, and that's not what I want to see in a new Ghostbusters film.
For the record, I do enjoy GB2. More than most, in fact. It's one of the few comedy movie sequels that work, and it's a lot less a waste of concept than MIB2 (something I'd call a spiritual successor to GB, not that Evolution movie or its awful cartoon series). But it really seems like it was made because the cartoon series became popular between movies and they wanted to cash in off it. Same deal with MIB2 and even Secret of the Ooze (Tokka and Rahzar were good, though). The cartoons just managed to make better use of the concept. There's influence in there as well, but not the influence that made them work as kid's shows. But I used to be a little more defensive about GB2, but the years of critique have gotten to me and I agree with some of it. If anything, this new movie at least has a better sounding plot than that one.