• Welcome to the Muppet Central Forum!
    You are viewing our forum as a guest. Join our free community to post topics and start private conversations. Please contact us if you need help.
  • Christmas Music
    Our 24th annual Christmas Music Merrython is underway on Muppet Central Radio. Listen to the best Muppet Christmas music of all-time through December 25.
  • Macy's Thanksgiving Parade
    Let us know your thoughts on the Sesame Street appearance at the annual Macy's Parade.
  • Jim Henson Idea Man
    Remember the life. Honor the legacy. Inspire your soul. The new Jim Henson documentary "Idea Man" is now streaming exclusively on Disney+.
  • Back to the Rock Season 2
    Fraggle Rock Back to the Rock Season 2 has premiered on AppleTV+. Watch the anticipated new season and let us know your thoughts.
  • Bear arrives on Disney+
    The beloved series has been off the air for the past 15 years. Now all four seasons are finally available for a whole new generation.
  • Sam and Friends Book
    Read our review of the long-awaited book, "Sam and Friends - The Story of Jim Henson's First Television Show" by Muppet Historian Craig Shemin.

Back To Square One?(The Muppets' 60th Anniversary)

minor muppetz

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2005
Messages
16,073
Reaction score
2,660
Today I thought of a concept that I've sort of thought up before: What if instead of one lasting series, Disney produced many Muppet series, with the intention of only having each around for one season or even half season (like the recent show Galavant)? Each show would have a somewhat different format and setting, and maybe some shows could be more like spin-offs starring a familiar character. In fact if it were more of a spin-off, fans might be more accepting to the newer characters (in a way Muppets Tonight could have been this... They could have called it something like "Clifford and Company", and audiences might have been more accepting of the limited exposure of Kermit, Miss Piggy, Fozzie, and other familiar characters, and more accepting to the dominance of new characters over old). Disney Drive-On with the Muppets kind of feels more like this concept, as that was intended for only six episodes and it seems more like a spin-off starring Walter and a few additional familiar characters, with Kermit only there in the first and last episodes. Of course, this idea could be comparable to Scooby Doo and Power Rangers as well.

If there ever is a show that's not about the Muppets putting on a show, I wonder what they would do about where the characters live. A fairly existing setting, like the boarding house or the apartment building from Letters to Santa? Would they live in their own houses/apartments in different buildings? Or would they rarely go home, instead going to a popular hang-out place, like a cafe or coffee shop (or maybe a bar)?

Another idea: The Muppets for whatever reason no longer work together on a regular basis but once a week they go to hang out somewhere (maybe a cafe, maybe a lodge) and talk about what they had done in the past week, with three big flashback stories (making this a "three shorts" show with a linking plot). Kermit, Piggy, Fozzie, Gonzo, and Pepe would usually be among the three to provide the flashback segments, with others getting their turns on occasion (but would more often be part of one of the five characters week instead, or just there hanging out without talking about their past week). Kermit's flashbacks could often involve Robin, Piggy's could involve Link, Strangepork, or Andy and Randy, Gonzo's could involve Rizzo and/or Camilla, Scooter could be involved in anyone's story, and so on. And their new lives could involve new characters, maybe at first the new ones would only appear in the flashbacks but eventually they can populate the hang-out spot and go on to appear in other Muppet productions. Depending on the average length of the segments, maybe the wrap-around segments could have a minor plotline.
 

dwayne1115

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2003
Messages
7,593
Reaction score
3,316
Today I thought of a concept that I've sort of thought up before: What if instead of one lasting series, Disney produced many Muppet series, with the intention of only having each around for one season or even half season (like the recent show Galavant)? Each show would have a somewhat different format and setting, and maybe some shows could be more like spin-offs starring a familiar character. In fact if it were more of a spin-off, fans might be more accepting to the newer characters (in a way Muppets Tonight could have been this... They could have called it something like "Clifford and Company", and audiences might have been more accepting of the limited exposure of Kermit, Miss Piggy, Fozzie, and other familiar characters, and more accepting to the dominance of new characters over old). Disney Drive-On with the Muppets kind of feels more like this concept, as that was intended for only six episodes and it seems more like a spin-off starring Walter and a few additional familiar characters, with Kermit only there in the first and last episodes. Of course, this idea could be comparable to Scooby Doo and Power Rangers as well.

If there ever is a show that's not about the Muppets putting on a show, I wonder what they would do about where the characters live. A fairly existing setting, like the boarding house or the apartment building from Letters to Santa? Would they live in their own houses/apartments in different buildings? Or would they rarely go home, instead going to a popular hang-out place, like a cafe or coffee shop (or maybe a bar)?

Another idea: The Muppets for whatever reason no longer work together on a regular basis but once a week they go to hang out somewhere (maybe a cafe, maybe a lodge) and talk about what they had done in the past week, with three big flashback stories (making this a "three shorts" show with a linking plot). Kermit, Piggy, Fozzie, Gonzo, and Pepe would usually be among the three to provide the flashback segments, with others getting their turns on occasion (but would more often be part of one of the five characters week instead, or just there hanging out without talking about their past week). Kermit's flashbacks could often involve Robin, Piggy's could involve Link, Strangepork, or Andy and Randy, Gonzo's could involve Rizzo and/or Camilla, Scooter could be involved in anyone's story, and so on. And their new lives could involve new characters, maybe at first the new ones would only appear in the flashbacks but eventually they can populate the hang-out spot and go on to appear in other Muppet productions. Depending on the average length of the segments, maybe the wrap-around segments could have a minor plotline.
OK, why are you not writing fan-fics? A lot of your ideas would make good fics.

Here is two things I would like to bring up that are kind of puzzling me.

First off in what part of the galaxy is Muppet Christmas Carol a cute kidish movie? I have heard that being said at least twice this week, and I just don't get it at all. To me Christmas Carol was way more dark and scarier then any other Muppet movie to date. So I really don't get where people are calling it cute, and kidish.

Secondly, Two very funny characters came out of Muppets Tonight, Pepe, and Bobo. Even when starting out they both where very funny, and to this day feel like they have always been a part of the Muppet family. So the adding of characters in that regard was great, because it gave Bill a chance to create two wonderful personalities that where original and fresh to the mix.
So I really don't think you can say that adding all the new characters is what killed Muppets Tonight.
 

minor muppetz

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2005
Messages
16,073
Reaction score
2,660
Secondly, Two very funny characters came out of Muppets Tonight, Pepe, and Bobo. Even when starting out they both where very funny, and to this day feel like they have always been a part of the Muppet family. So the adding of characters in that regard was great, because it gave Bill a chance to create two wonderful personalities that where original and fresh to the mix.
So I really don't think you can say that adding all the new characters is what killed Muppets Tonight.
Muppets Tonight had so many great characters (and a few bad characters, though some fans may think differently regarding whether certain characters were great or annoying), but part of the problem was that they had so many new characters at once and so much focus on them over the classics that we knew. In fact while a lot of us felt that way, I don't think I've heard of any instances where a casual fan or reviewers cited that as a negative point about the show (though according to Jim Henson: The Biography, critics disliked the new characters from The Jim Henson Hour). I can imagine casual fans tuning in hoping to see their favorite characters and possibly being surprised, at the very least by Kermit not hosting, wondering who Clifford was, and at the very least surprised that Miss Piggy and Fozzie weren't used that much (though of those two I initially only noticed Fozzie not getting much screen time).

At the time Muppets Tonight premiered, I didn't have the internet, so there was a lot I didn't know (in addition to a lot that I did know). By that point I was really just starting to know that Frank Oz had a directing career but didn't realize that it interfered with him performing the Muppets. I knew Jim Henson had died and suspected that Richard Hunt had also, but didn't think they were avoiding recasting (the three biggest Muppet productions to have come out after that were productions where the Muppets played roles, which seems to make it natural that certain main characters wouldn't have sizable parts). Kirk Thatcher and Jim Lewis have both said that they thought of the show as a "next generation" series and that introducing many new characters was necessary. In The Muppet Mindset interview with Kirk Thatcher, he pointed out that new characters were introduced all the time on The Muppet Show (though it seems like new characters were scarcer in the last two seasons, where most new characters, even ones that weren't made from Whatnots, only appeared in one or two episodes). That got me thinking about Sesame Street: For awhile, I had noticed that there had only been a small number of new characters in the past several years, but then I started thinking that for about the first 31 seasons, there were new Muppets introduced all the time on that show, and then the creation of new recurring Muppets started to drop within a year of Sesame Workshop buying the Sesame Street Muppets. Makes me wonder if Henson was more interested in creating new characters than Sesame Workshop, or if the Workshop felt they had enough characters by then (there were a fair number of new characters within the first couple of years after the change in ownership - Lulu, Little Murray Sparkles, the Monster Clubhouse cast, Curly Bear, Cousin Monster - but with the possible exception of Curly Bear - I'm not sure how often Baby Bear's family has been used in the last few seasons - none of those characters lasted). Of course there's also the fact that shortly after that Sesame Workshop changed the format to include many recurring segments needed for every episode (or every other episode), many fairly long and only featuring a handful of familiar characters, and then shortening the number of episodes per season to 26, which might make it difficult to find time to introduce new characters.

Back when the new Muppet show planned for Fox was announced, press releases said that it would have new characters. I was thinking that The Jim Henson Company "knew better" at that point about having more new characters than old characters, and at this point the company was starting to recast Scooter, Rowlf, Dr. Teeth, Janice, and others, but I had worried that the mention of new characters meant that they'd be featured more than the old characters. But then recently the pilot script leaked online, and there's not really any new characters in that script. I don't really know what to make of the pilot script... There are good things about it, but also a lot that wasn't that great.

There are so many theories about what caused Muppets Tonight to be canceled, some more likely than others, but Kirk Thatcher recently mentioned something that he thinks might have contributed to it: At the time, ABC got a manager who was mostly interested in shows that brought in males aged 18-35, a demographic that likely wasn't going to be too interested in Muppets unless they had kids.
 

Muppet Master

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2014
Messages
2,599
Reaction score
1,621
One thing I liked about MT was how it tried to be more adult, which is what I always like in the muppets, I loved the show, I get the hate, but it matters little to me I just like the show. I really do not know what would happen in a new muppet show, but one thing that would not work these days is the TMS format
 

Aaron

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2002
Messages
1,194
Reaction score
66
I think the TMS format would be welcomed by audiences today. it's familiar.
 

Drtooth

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2002
Messages
31,717
Reaction score
6,710
I still think the most horrifying thing if Henson still owned the Muppets would be who the movie rights would have gone to.

I needn't say the name. You know who it is.

If anything, the Muppets need a new comic book. Disney has just licensed out its classic Disneyverse comics to IDW, something I'm totally ecstatic about. If they're open to licensing out comics that, frankly, Americans don't appreciate (raise your hands if you think anything Scrooge McDuck related is just Ducktales stuff), I think it's high time to do the same with characters who have done well in comics past. Problem is, would we get the same kind of creative force Roger Langridge was? He was the heart and soul of the Muppet comics, and I really wish he could submit a script to an actual Muppet Project outside of that. I'll admit, only three of the Fairy Tale series were really good, sandwiched in a confused, almost directionless start and a disappointing finish. Seems the comics brought much more to the nostalgic Muppet table than the movies did. Which is a shame, but in their defense, these were really good comics.
 

beaker

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2002
Messages
7,761
Reaction score
858
Yeah, but the thing was they weren't really getting a lot of projects in that time. There was VMX, a bunch of failed projects and crappy guest shots on crappy shows and then MWOO. We got so much merchandise that we actually had to be picky, and I think that had a LOT more to do with JHC having a bad time getting a project out. So it's like, would you rather merchandise or movies?

That's why we've seen so much oddly hard to collect outside of a comic book Fraggle stuff. There's no way there's ever going to be a movie or any reasonable semblance of a comeback. Heck, you can say that for any of JHC's franchises. Only the CGI kid's shows are successful... and even with Doozers, it's hard to gauge that one being on Hulu. And premium Hulu to boot. I don't think we'd see much more or better Muppet merchandise if Henson still owned them. Maybe a comic book or something. If Fraggle Rock is any indication of how Henson markets anything, we'd get a bunch of ugly high end t-shirts and statues and stuff like that. I'm disappointed there's nothing really special out there Muppets wise outside of some plush, figure sets, and the Funko Pop figures that sold out the second they hit shelves. Then again, would we really want to see Kermit the Frog Snackees?

When it comes to other Disney outlets, I don't see anything really special either outside of, strangely, the same exact things. I don't see an indie toy company making highly detailed Frozen collectible action figures out there. Only reason why Star Wars and Marvel have anything like that is that they consistently had that, and Hasbro still holds the licenses for both.
Yeah that is weird how Funko has literally tapped every franchise under the sun, including rather obscure ones...but there's no Fraggle Rock. Strangely, one of my least favorite stores(Spencers) carried a number of Fraggle Rock wearables even as of a few years ago. I did tend to prefer though, the Fraggle merchandise(pvcs, plushes, etc) made as part of the 2002-2005 Muppet merch renaissaince than the more boutiquey expensive stuff of the last few years. Of course best thing for Fraggle fans in recent time has been the amazing gorgeous comics. AND we finally got new Fraggle shorts...well, more like a Ben Folds Five music video, a couple of Hub promos, and an appearance at the Carnegie Hall Jim Henson Celebration(WHY JHC can make all those tacky adult puppet skits and not a single Fraggle Rock short is beyond me)

I'm all for Doozers actually. Heck I'd buy the dvd. Not sure why it's not actually on tv...is it really worse than any of the other simplistic cg kids morning stuff on tv? Just lame Disney forever buried Bear in the Big Blue House. A franchise that was a billion times better than Hoobs, Animal Jam, Big Bag, or Pajanimals.

It's true...now that Star Wars and Marvel are on super nova critical mass level again; in addition to the runaway insanity of Frozen on top of Pixar...I sadly see fewer and fewer opportunities they'll give to the Muffins.
 

beaker

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2002
Messages
7,761
Reaction score
858
I for one in retrospect love Muppets Tonight. I'd buy a complete box set tomorrow. I don't see why Disney couldn't have let Lionsgate release
the Muppet Television portion of the Jim Henson Hour 1989 season since Lionsgate already released everything else from the show. Really bummed that, MT, and Muppets @WDW never made it to the home market.

I still think the most horrifying thing if Henson still owned the Muppets would be who the movie rights would have gone to.

I needn't say the name. You know who it is.

If anything, the Muppets need a new comic book. Disney has just licensed out its classic Disneyverse comics to IDW, something I'm totally ecstatic about. If they're open to licensing out comics that, frankly, Americans don't appreciate (raise your hands if you think anything Scrooge McDuck related is just Ducktales stuff), I think it's high time to do the same with characters who have done well in comics past. Problem is, would we get the same kind of creative force Roger Langridge was? He was the heart and soul of the Muppet comics, and I really wish he could submit a script to an actual Muppet Project outside of that. I'll admit, only three of the Fairy Tale series were really good, sandwiched in a confused, almost directionless start and a disappointing finish. Seems the comics brought much more to the nostalgic Muppet table than the movies did. Which is a shame, but in their defense, these were really good comics.
And it's funny as many people on the Muppet online community/forums hated Roger's art when it was previewed. I thought it was fantastic, and I'm happy
the comics lasted as long as they did...and in a way still continue through the Fraggle Rock comics and the recent Langridge Muppety Turkey Hollow graphic novel. Other than the Labyrinth and Dark Crystal Ameri-mangas, we didn't get any Muppet or JHC comics in the 2000's even during the height of the 2002-2005 Muppet/JHC avalanche of merchandise.
 

minor muppetz

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2005
Messages
16,073
Reaction score
2,660
Yeah that is weird how Funko has literally tapped every franchise under the sun, including rather obscure ones...but there's no Fraggle Rock.
There's no Dinosaurs toys from Funko, either. Those would be great.


I for one in retrospect love Muppets Tonight. I'd buy a complete box set tomorrow. I don't see why Disney couldn't have let Lionsgate release
the Muppet Television portion of the Jim Henson Hour 1989 season since Lionsgate already released everything else from the show.
Well, Henson doesn't own the rights to the whole Jim Henson Hour. Disney owns the distribution rights to the MuppeTelevision segments (and Miss Piggy's Hollywood and The Secrets of the Muppets).
 

Drtooth

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2002
Messages
31,717
Reaction score
6,710
Yeah that is weird how Funko has literally tapped every franchise under the sun, including rather obscure ones...but there's no Fraggle Rock.
I don't know how rights acquisitions work. I could most definitely see Funko tapping into Fraggle Rock for these things. They're no more or less obscure than some of the movies and TV shows from the 80's they've done. And given the venues that usually sell them, they're ripe for that kind of market. I never see a single action figure collector's line sell, but Funko Pops always disappear before and after a major holiday.

I'm all for Doozers actually. Heck I'd buy the dvd. Not sure why it's not actually on tv...is it really worse than any of the other simplistic cg kids morning stuff on tv? Just lame Disney forever buried Bear in the Big Blue House. A franchise that was a billion times better than Hoobs, Animal Jam, Big Bag, or Pajanimals.
PBS lost an opportunity there. But nooooo they just can't get rid of their precious Superwhy that was only barely popular for a year anyway. They've been so good to Henson with Sid and DinoTrain, why the heck did they pas that up? It was made in Canada so it got a tax credit. It should have been cheap enough to get some actual TV pick up. After all, the only profitable forms of children's entertainment are somehow geared towards preschoolers or Tweens who are to young to remember the 1980's sitcoms their shows steal their plots from. There's more venue for preschool shows than ever, and networks that run preschool shows have their own preschool channels. You mean to tell me in the realm of Nick Jr., Nick Jr. the channel, Disney Junior and its channel, PBS, PBS Sprout, Qubo... all of that, they couldn't find a place for it on television and dumped it on Netflix? Say what you will about Disney's ownership of the Muppets. At least corporate synergy would have guaranteed a preschool Muppet project a nice long stay on both of it's channels.
 
Top