jvcarroll
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2012
- Messages
- 1,660
- Reaction score
- 1,999
It seems that social media has gone mad over the Batman casting for the new Superman follow-up and all subsequent DC-universe films.
We've seen this before with several castings, particularly for superhero films. But never with this swift level of almost ridiculous outrage. People are even petitioning the White House to step in. That is bat-s*** crazy!
I must admit that Ben Affleck wouldn't have even made my list of choices. He's a capable actor, but in kind of a bland, white bread way. Name one iconic scene in a Ben Affleck movie that stands out in your mind. Michael Keaton, Val Kilmer, Christian Bale and Heath Ledger had these under their belts before being cast in their iconic roles. Henry Cavil lent a rather haunting performance to The Tudors. I knew he was headed for something back then. Even if you are able to accomplish this nearly impossible task of recalling a memorable Affleck moment, was it he that lent the gravitas to that scene? I don't think so and 75% of the web seems to agree. That's a remarkable number of people who consider Affleck to be an unremarkable actor.
He's been given several chances at franchise films, and even a superhero picture, and none of them have been very successful. However, his recent turn at directing has been amazing. Argo is pretty good. The Town was really amazing. I kind of wish he'd transition into directing only.
Affleck isn't the kind of choice Snyder or Nolan would make. This seems to be a studio decision directly from Warner Brothers. This seems to be their thank you for Argo. Does that mean there will be more of a corporate hand in these films? Will WB try to find an escape hatch if this outrage continues? Probably not.
I can live with this choice. It's not terrible casting. There are just so many better choices like Michael Fassbender, Karl Urban, Timothy Olyphant, Jon Hamm and even Tom Hardy. Whomever was selected was going to get flack. I just don't think anyone expected this much.
I'm giving Ben Affleck and this movie a chance. The Internet is going to whine no matter what. People here have complained about having yet another Batman film and superhero films in general. I reject those gripes. Like it or not, Batman is a very popular brand. He'll keep returning to films until they stop making money. Then they'll wait a while and do it all over again. Heck, Marvel released three different films containing three different Hulks within nine years.
I'm just glad they've sealed-off Nolan's Batman, they're skipping the origin story and they're going for a 40-something Bruce Wayne. Whomever plays Batman, I just hope this leads to future Batman films that don't have to be quite as heavy as Nolans'. Those were beautiful, but it's time for something else.
Anyway, that's my rambling two cents.
We've seen this before with several castings, particularly for superhero films. But never with this swift level of almost ridiculous outrage. People are even petitioning the White House to step in. That is bat-s*** crazy!
I must admit that Ben Affleck wouldn't have even made my list of choices. He's a capable actor, but in kind of a bland, white bread way. Name one iconic scene in a Ben Affleck movie that stands out in your mind. Michael Keaton, Val Kilmer, Christian Bale and Heath Ledger had these under their belts before being cast in their iconic roles. Henry Cavil lent a rather haunting performance to The Tudors. I knew he was headed for something back then. Even if you are able to accomplish this nearly impossible task of recalling a memorable Affleck moment, was it he that lent the gravitas to that scene? I don't think so and 75% of the web seems to agree. That's a remarkable number of people who consider Affleck to be an unremarkable actor.
He's been given several chances at franchise films, and even a superhero picture, and none of them have been very successful. However, his recent turn at directing has been amazing. Argo is pretty good. The Town was really amazing. I kind of wish he'd transition into directing only.
Affleck isn't the kind of choice Snyder or Nolan would make. This seems to be a studio decision directly from Warner Brothers. This seems to be their thank you for Argo. Does that mean there will be more of a corporate hand in these films? Will WB try to find an escape hatch if this outrage continues? Probably not.
I can live with this choice. It's not terrible casting. There are just so many better choices like Michael Fassbender, Karl Urban, Timothy Olyphant, Jon Hamm and even Tom Hardy. Whomever was selected was going to get flack. I just don't think anyone expected this much.
I'm giving Ben Affleck and this movie a chance. The Internet is going to whine no matter what. People here have complained about having yet another Batman film and superhero films in general. I reject those gripes. Like it or not, Batman is a very popular brand. He'll keep returning to films until they stop making money. Then they'll wait a while and do it all over again. Heck, Marvel released three different films containing three different Hulks within nine years.
I'm just glad they've sealed-off Nolan's Batman, they're skipping the origin story and they're going for a 40-something Bruce Wayne. Whomever plays Batman, I just hope this leads to future Batman films that don't have to be quite as heavy as Nolans'. Those were beautiful, but it's time for something else.
Anyway, that's my rambling two cents.