Who was worse?

Which Villain was Worse?


  • Total voters
    16

Misskermie

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2011
Messages
6,690
Reaction score
1,488
So, what's worse? Tearing down the theatre for oil, or for a night club?
 

CensoredAlso

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Messages
13,453
Reaction score
2,291
For me it's the oil, there's no defending it at this point.
 

newsmanfan

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2011
Messages
2,886
Reaction score
1,661
------------------
Honestly, I think Bitterman dripped evil with every line better than Tex did.

--------------
 

Dominicboo1

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2011
Messages
2,408
Reaction score
877
Rachel. Richman does cheat at the end, but Bitterman is a you know what from the beginning to end and is a lying rotten old hag. Joan Cusack is great as a villian.
------------------
Honestly, I think Bitterman dripped evil with every line better than Tex did.

--------------
I you like her there. See Addams Family Values. She's hilariously evil.
 

Beauregard

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2002
Messages
19,240
Reaction score
1,239
Rachel was more evil, to me, because she SUCCEEDED in making Kermit give up, where Richman didn't really manage. I do wonder what would have happened to Kermit if Dani-el hadn't appeared though. I'm guessing that eventually Piggy would have gone out to get him and taken over the situation, similar to her role in The Muppets.

When Rachel tells Fozzie he smells like a burnt couch, and tells Kermit that he ruins people's lives...That is Evil.

When Tex has a little dance around his office and cuts out the power...Not so much.
 

Misskermie

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2011
Messages
6,690
Reaction score
1,488
Rachel was more evil, to me, because she SUCCEEDED in making Kermit give up
Well that's not nessecarily true, because Kermit WAS about to give up, after asking Tex for the theatre back, but Miss Piggy straigtened him out.
 

CensoredAlso

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2002
Messages
13,453
Reaction score
2,291
I still have to go with Tex in the long term. He convinces people he's this benevolent "philanthropist" when he's really trying out to demolish historical landmarks and destroy the natural environment. We see that type of bad guy everyday in real life but so many of us fall for their tricks.
 

Misskermie

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2011
Messages
6,690
Reaction score
1,488
I'm being so neutral right now...

*Ahem* Rachael Changed the contract, which is just as evil as pretending to be a philanthropist.
 
Top