Did anyone think the Inchworm sketch was ironic?
Here is an insectivorial animal (first it was a frog, then a lizard) sitting on a wall and minding his own bussiness when a little worm taps him and gets eaten. After it happens again, the worm turns out to be the nose a monster who is either hungry himself and eats the first muppet, or just eats him for the sake of eating something (this is up for debate).
The way I see it is that the insectivore lets his own confidence in his superiority and in the end bites the nose of a monster, who apparently stayed in hiding waiting for a chance to catch his prey. I suppose I am saying it is similar to a food chain.
Here is an insectivorial animal (first it was a frog, then a lizard) sitting on a wall and minding his own bussiness when a little worm taps him and gets eaten. After it happens again, the worm turns out to be the nose a monster who is either hungry himself and eats the first muppet, or just eats him for the sake of eating something (this is up for debate).
The way I see it is that the insectivore lets his own confidence in his superiority and in the end bites the nose of a monster, who apparently stayed in hiding waiting for a chance to catch his prey. I suppose I am saying it is similar to a food chain.
Welcome to the Muppet Central Forum!
FIFA World Cup 2026 Final Halftime Show
The Muppet Show
Sesame Street Classics on YouTube
Sesame Street debuts on Netflix
Back to the Rock Season 2
Sam and Friends Book
Jim Henson Idea Man
Bear arrives on Disney+