Beauregard
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2002
- Messages
- 19,240
- Reaction score
- 1,239
I am going to state, for the record, that I have seen the show...And I am reserving judgement for now.
~Beau
~Beau
Get a grip ... I was only half-serious.gigglesock said:Disney sells fluff? Right. And Tickle Me Elmo isn't fluff at all.
You don't need to be goth or emo to have some DEPTH. Touched By an Angel wasn't emo ... but it didn't have paper-thin characterization, either. I can appreciate "wholesomeness" ... how "Hey, look, we smiled" equals "wholesomeness" ... I just don't know.Disney Channel has shows that feature clean-cut kids (Miley's dippy offscreen photo blunders notwithstanding) that espouse positive values, and parents appreciate that, and kids love the shows.
And where HAVE the Muppets been (heck, where's Mickey been? ... Disney is racist [this is SARCASM for those who don't understand the concept] against its own fictional characters!). The proof in the pudding is the fact that tweens and kids went ga-ga over "Look I sang a song" superstars and dismissed/griped about "puppets" ... yes, Disney did such a wonderful job keeping the Muppets in the public eye.What is so wrong with that? Honestly, the anti-Disney mania here is pretty weird, especially coming from people who are desperate to get the Muppets on TV again.
For less than 30 minutes ... TO INTRODUCE WELL-ROUNDED CHARACTERS WITH HISTORY. And this isn't just a gripe about the treatment of the Muppets. I don't like/know much about Disney tweens. I would have appreciated knowing THEIR history. But that's how Disney works: put someone in front of a screen ... forget about plot and characterization ... call it a show.And what did mean ol' Disney do? Why, it provided the Muppets with a plum timeslot,
And from what I've been hearing, they STILL thought Kermit ... KERMIT ... is some "dumb old sock puppet".co-stars that guaranteed viewership even from those viewers who think Kermit is a just dumb old sock puppet their parents used to watch, and still you guys rail against the company that rescued your fixation. Amazing. Simply amazing.
I second that!I am going to state, for the record, that I have seen the show...And I am reserving judgement for now.
~Beau
Ah, I was wondering if anyone was going to bring this up. That was my first reaction. The direction on this show was terrible. Obviously by someone who had never directed a puppet show. The cuts were so quick, you couldn't even see the puppets. (Well, what can you expect from a director named "Krash". I'll bet you anything this guy came from music videos.) I don't even know how the puppeteers performed, unless there was a camera always aimed at them and they watched that instead of the quick cutting. Just horrible.That doesn't mean I didn't like it...I'm still formulating a reply, don't take that out of context...But I felt as if I had struggled to breath during the show due to the tight editing and weird cuts.
I think the quick cutting was a poorly executed effort to make the Muppets appear more "matter of fact" than puppet to an audience unimpressed by the art form. That is a common mistake made these days with the Muppets and puppetry in general. The characters sustain credibility just fine if given some breathing room.Ah, I was wondering if anyone was going to bring this up. That was my first reaction. The direction on this show was terrible. Obviously by someone who had never directed a puppet show. The cuts were so quick, you couldn't even see the puppets. (Well, what can you expect from a director named "Krash". I'll bet you anything this guy came from music videos.) I don't even know how the puppeteers performed, unless there was a camera always aimed at them and they watched that instead of the quick cutting. Just horrible...
I thought the writing was lame and the jokes lukewarm at best. The original Muppet Show did corny jokes, but at least they could sell them...
I don't think the Disney people have any idea what the Muppets are about or how to handle them.
And the weird thing is, someone said that kids "didn't get it" ... which actually provides me with both joy and irritation. Irritation that no one seems to appreciate the Muppets, but JOY that kids found it hard to figure out ... HELLO ... it was hard to figure out because it was a poorly written plot! The fact that kids picked up on that tells me that, had the special made sense, they would have liked the characters more.frogboy4 said:I think the quick cutting was a poorly executed effort to make the Muppets appear more "matter of fact" than puppet to an audience unimpressed by the art form. That is a common mistake made these days with the Muppets and puppetry in general. The characters sustain credibility just fine if given some breathing room.
Exactly ... though it's hardly a Disney problem. I pray the Hensons have better luck with the Fraggles and such.Breathing room - that's something the Disney Channel doesn't provide in any area. The channel is like one big cluttered glossy pull-out ad found in the middle of the Sunday paper - a whole lot of color and "look at me" without anything really of note.
And, if you want to prove that the Muppets aren't "just for kids" ... introducing them to a bunch of elementary school-aged kids seems a weird choice.The Muppets have been sitting on the Mouse's shelf, making only minor appearances until fan Segel noticed and pitched a film. Disney brass was impressed, decided to allow him to further the property in ways they haven't understood. Disney is not good with blind-faith efforts. The recent YouTube uploads and Muppets.com clips can only take the characters so far. This Studio DC Almost Live project is target marketing intended to merge the Muppets with properties geared toward their key demographic. It wasn't meant for much more than that. I just wish it had been.
It used to be the practice under Jim Henson and the Creature Shop that there usually wouldn't be multiple puppets for any given character. When one puppet would wear out a new one would be built using parts from the older one. This does not appear to be the case anymore - especially with Miss Piggy.
I remember it being said that a poser of Piggy was problematic because the company now in charge of Muppet building, Puppet Heap I think, wouldn't release the head mold due to contractual or trade secret matters. I do believe that but also think they realize that they don't have a handle on just how to build the pig yet. She keeps changing and it's not just converted posers to puppets. There were at least three Piggy heads in that special (if not four or even five). It wasn't just different wig attachments; she was an entirely different headed pig. She didn't look too bad, but she could have looked better like in my recent comp. The other puppets seem to look pretty good this time out except Kermit looked kind of portly in his blue outfit.
I don't think Disney is the type of company that would be comfortable with having only one puppet of each character. This may come from them.
That's actually kinda the way she acts in her show, too. I watched enough of it over the last month looking for "Studio DC" commercials.Mileys performance just seemed a bit over-reacted, like they put her in a studio, told her to stand next to "this puppet" and do whatever moves or facial expressions, lol.