Bob, Gordon, and Luis: FIRED!

Censored

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2003
Messages
1,693
Reaction score
554
Why should people be fired over their age under any circumstances, as long as they are able to do their jobs? If it wasn't for McGrath, Orman, and Delgado keeping the show going all these years, the current producers wouldn't even have a job themselves with Sesame Workshop today.
 

Oscarfan

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 2, 2008
Messages
7,527
Reaction score
3,957
Why should people be fired over their age under any circumstances, as long as they are able to do their jobs? If it wasn't for McGrath, Orman, and Delgado keeping the show going all these years, the current producers wouldn't even have a job themselves with Sesame Workshop today.
Debatable. Yes, the humans have been an essential role, but literally anyone could've been on the show for as long as they were. The Muppets are the soul of the show. It's been said that they couldn't get Jim Henson for this, there wouldn't be puppets.

The humans gave the show realism, but the Muppets give it longevity.
 

Censored

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2003
Messages
1,693
Reaction score
554
I can see the argument of kids not paying attention to characters old enough to be their grandfathers,
Ironically, Sesame Street was inspired by Captain Kangaroo, who made a point of always playing an older man, even when he was young, to promote the special bond between grandparents and their grandchildren.
 

Censored

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2003
Messages
1,693
Reaction score
554
Debatable. Yes, the humans have been an essential role, but literally anyone could've been on the show for as long as they were. QUOTE]
Have to disagree. Those roles were special because the actors made them special.
 

Drtooth

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2002
Messages
31,717
Reaction score
6,706
The humans gave the show realism, but the Muppets give it longevity.
The Electric Company lasted, what, like 10 years maybe including reruns? Square One Television lasted until 92 after premiering in 87. I'm not saying these shows are relatively unheard of, but say "Cookie Monster" and everyone you meet will say "OH! Yeah, I remember him!" I fell off the chair I was sitting in when I watched a Fresh Off the Boat where they referenced "Mathnet." And I almost completely forgot about 321 Contact.

The Muppets indeed made the show more profitable, more memorable, and more approachable than it would have if Sesame Street were just humans and cartoon skits. Let's not forget the marketing. Human characters appeared in books well through the 80's, but for the sake of marketability and easy cultural translation, this shifted to be more Muppet based, and human roles were now taken by adult monsters and AM's. And let's not forget the international scale. While some humans appeared in some of the dubbed skits, it's just less awkward to pull off the illusion that Ernie and Bert live there in Germany with their human characters who they never actually interact with.

I do agree the humans and Muppets balanced each other out nicely, it's just we saw a lot more human skits before Sesame Street really took off with a larger roster of characters. Like those increasingly terrible sitcom comedy duos that thankfully disappeared within a few years of the show. Replaced by more monsters, more parody characters, more Am kid sketches. We saw a decrease in human alone skits since the late 70's into the 80's, but they always remained a staple in the street stories with impeccable balance.

Yet, we come to the time paradox. How many times did Bart and Lisa Simpson go on summer break, only to come back to the same exact same grade in the fall? How many Christmases did they have? Bart's been 10 so long that he'd be in his 40's in real time. But its a cartoon. That can be pulled off easily. Not so much when Elmo was there at the birth of Gabi, and he's still an audience surrogate 3 and a half year old when the actress is old enough to have kids of her own Elmo's age. But there is one thing we're forgetting... The Fleeting Demographic Rule

The show has a (and this is a very generous estimation) 2-6 year old turn around. Kids watch the show for about 4 years, grow out of it, probably watch it a good 20+ years later if they have kids of their own. Would they care who Bob is if they've never seen him in an episode before? Let me put it this way...Trix. 90's kids complain hard about how the cereal is no longer fruit shaped when the cereal was never fruit shaped to begin with and actually reverted close to the original version. Generations are all possessive about things in their generation. All I can say. The kids with kids watching now...and wait for it...it gets pretty hairy...grew up on Elmo's World. Elmo's World alone is 20 years old!
 

Censored

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2003
Messages
1,693
Reaction score
554
Oscar The Grouch would not have been nearly as funny if he didn't have human characters to annoy. Big Bird's childlike curiosity would have meant nothing without human adults to teach him.
 

Pig'sSaysAdios

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2015
Messages
6,418
Reaction score
4,644
Have to disagree. Those roles were special because the actors made them special.
Yes, those actors did make them special. But had they always been someone else, we wouldn't know the difference. I think that's what Oscarfan was saying. Bob, Susan and Gordon aren't the only actors out there with charm and about the same age.
 

Censored

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2003
Messages
1,693
Reaction score
554
Yes, those actors did make them special. But had they always been someone else, we wouldn't know the difference. I think that's what Oscarfan was saying. Bob, Susan and Gordon aren't the only actors out there with charm and about the same age.

Again, I must disagree. Bob McGrath basically used his own personality to develop his character. Roscoe Orman and Emilio Delgado also put a lot of themselves into the parts. It's not like they were just random roles that anyone could have done. If actors got the roles who did not have the right chemistry or fit, it could have definitely interfered with the program's success.

In any case, age discrimination should have no place in 2016.
 

D'Snowth

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2003
Messages
38,849
Reaction score
12,813
In any case, age discrimination should have no place in 2016.
Yeah, well, racism has no place in 2016, yet we've got white cops killing black people, resulting in Black Lives Matter protests, which has also resulted in Blue Lives Matter protests, which has also resulted in black people killing white cops, which has also resulted in All Lives Matter protests, which has also resulted in All Lives Didn't Matter protests, which has become a never-ending cycle.
 

Pig'sSaysAdios

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2015
Messages
6,418
Reaction score
4,644
Again, I must disagree. Bob McGrath basically used his own personality to develop his character. Roscoe Orman and Emilio Delgado also put a lot of themselves into the parts. It's not like they were just random roles that anyone could have done. If actors got the roles who did not have the right chemistry or fit, it could have definitely interfered with the program's success.
No, but the thing is, even if Emilio, Sonia, Roscoe etc hadn't been hired than we would have gotten completely different characters based on whomever else they hired. And if they didn't have enough chemistry, than given the nature of the show, they would've been fired and replaced. Such is the case with many, many of the cast members from the 70s, 80s and 90s.
 
Top