![]() |
The
Muppets' Wizard of Oz
D.W. McKim (June 3, 2005) - After "It's a Very Merry Muppet Christmas Movie", I could hardly wait to find out what the next big Muppet project would be. I felt they were really getting back on track, but then came the news that there would be another telefilm and it would be a remake of "The Wizard of Oz". I was not very happy about the news since it seemed like a huge step backwards. The films where they play other characters pale in comparison to when they play themselves. Oz seemed a bit like kiddy fare, and they were taking on a story that has been done to death that really did not need another film adaptation. Let sleeping Toto’s lie! Especially compared to several of the other film projects I knew had been on the discussion table. This was such a poor choice. Apparently, I was not alone.
Emotions among Muppet fans have been very strong concerning this movie. There have been very strong and passionate discussions on Muppet message boards all around. It seems a lot of people had a hard time just sitting back and enjoying it because they knew at least in the back of their minds that there would be so many politics involved. Would Disney suck the life out of the Muppets? If it wasn't a success either in quality or in the ratings, would that mean the end of the Muppets? All and all, this was still a Muppet movie. A project meant to entertain by a troupe known for its whimsy. Whatever else may be going on behind the scenes, when it came time to watch, I wanted to just relax and just watch the movie and just let it take me where it would. Because my expectations had been rather low, I ended up being pleasantly surprised by how much I enjoyed it. Many fans will strongly agree and many will strongly disagree with the views expressed here. While not the greatest thing the Muppets have ever done, it was by no means a disaster. More than that, I thought it was the strongest of the Muppet story film adaptations. I came away at the end feeling they did the project justice and was happy to have watched. THE MUPPETS
But while the project was a tour de force for Piggy, Eric's handling of Fozzie shouldn't be overlooked either. What makes Eric such a great recast is not only because his vocal qualities match that of his predecessor but also because his characterizations are equally as strong and true to what's been developed prior. Fozzie seemed more Fozzie-like than he has in quite some time (including many times when he's been performed by Frank). It took awhile for Eric to really get the hang of Fozzie's voice, but "Wizard" was the first time when I really felt Jacobson had nailed Fozzie down as well as he has Piggy.
Aside from the main roles, there were some truly inspired cameos for characters such as Statler and Waldorf, Clifford, and The Swedish Chef, but it was especially nice to see many of the Treasure Island pirates brought back as the Flying Monkeys (though it would have been even better to have Polly and Clueless among them). Crazy Harry is a fan favorite that unfortunately has been relegated to the back burner due to world events making the character a bit too "explosive" a persona. It was nice to see him get the most onscreen time that he's ever had in a Muppet movie but also deliver what may be his first speaking lines on television or in the movies since the late 80's. Another welcome return was Foo Foo. In many ways, Foo Foo has always been a prop for Miss Piggy but Alice Dinnean actually managed to steal some scenes with the pup and had me laughing out loud.
THE HUMANS Often the human casting in Muppet movies can be a mixed bag with some great choices among some really questionable ones. It was pretty much a given that Queen Latifah would lend her always strong screen presence to Aunt Em, but in casting Ashanti as Dorothy, would we be suffering through yet another young singer cast in a major acting part that she otherwise would not have been considered for? As someone who generally detests this practice, I'll be the first to say that Ashanti showed herself not only of being a capable lead actress but also displayed the ability to act along the Muppets' goofiness which not even some of the most seasoned actors are always able to accomplish.
EFFECTS AND COSTUMES Speaking of the Wizard, many fans weren't impressed with the CGI effects but it's my belief that they were supposed to look a bit cheesy. We all know the story and know that what each character sees when visiting the Wizard is an artificial construct and the production team took a risk making it look a bit out of whack since a lot of viewers probably wouldn't get that it was purposeful but the giveaway or wink to the audience comes when Gonzo sees the beautiful woman who morphs into a chicken. The fact that not only did they not use a real actress (which would have been easier and less expensive) but also made her look obviously like something out of a video game was the signal that "yes, it's not supposed to look too authentic". I did notice that the Wizard's appearances to both Kermit and Dorothy looked rather inspired by Farscape's Rygel, definitely a Hynerian look going on there.
THE SCRIPT The script overall had the typically Muppet elements of mixing adult and family humor mocking everything from trendy nightclubs to color warning codes. There were a number of lines throughout that caught me off guard and had me rolling on the floor like "friends of Dorothy", "getting witch-slapped", and Pepe's observation of Munchkinland being a small world after all. I particularly loved seeing Poppyfields transformed into an evening hotspot (again with a great cameo for Clifford plus the Electric Mayhem among others).
Still, the script was not without its weaknesses. The most glaring of which was when the very first mention of the Muppets comes when Uncle Henry refers to them as the world's most powerful puppet troupe totally breaking their reality up front. The Muppets can often engage in self mockery but given that line was essentially their whole introduction, it changes their dynamic and sets them up as fictional characters straight away. Like we should expect Dorothy to see a man underneath Kermit when she talks with him. We should expect things to not be what they seem in Oz, but the real life should have some aspect of reality. The other major gaping hole that lends evidence that there were some rushed rewrites was that at the end of the film, its left clear without room for interpretation that Dorothy really did visit the land of Oz and this was not a dream or hallucination. She comes back to Kansas in her new wardrobe, returns to find her face on missing posters and her entry via golden twister is witnessed by people on the street. Yet, why is it then that when she came to Oz, her pet prawn all of a sudden Muppetizes and can talk? This suggests conceptual variances in between drafts of the script that were never fully reconciled. CONCLUDING THOUGHTS
|
||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||