Photobucket Ransoming Users Accounts

D'Snowth

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2003
Messages
40,651
Reaction score
12,811
It's hard to believe that anybody out there would still be using Photobucket, but they do, and I've been one of them: I've been using Photobucket for about twelve years now, and it was mainly at the suggestion of some people here when I was looking for a service to store pics to avoid using up space and bandwidth on servers that would host websites I did like KGZ and such. After all these years, I continued to use Photobucket simply because they were, once upon a time, the most reliable and secure image-hosting service out there: other alternatives were always (and in many cases, still are) sketchy.

Then over the years, Photobucket started changing: I remember several years ago, they started distorting and compressing uploaded images as a way of conserving their own bandwidth . . . they eventually stopped doing it, but the damage they did was pemanent and irreversible, so now many of my older pics I have on Photobucket look like low-quality JPEGs that were edited in Microsoft Paint. More recently, they started resizing uploads that were over 1000px - I didn't have too many images larger than that size, but on some occasions, I would, so now, likewise, the damage has been done and is irreversible. Then they started policing what you could upload to your account, even if they were set to private (much like how private and unlisted videos on YouTube can still receive copyright strikes).

Now the icing on the cake: over the past few days, I've been noticing images that were hosted on Photobucket on other sites were suddenly disappearing and being replaced with something that said 3rd party hosting had been exceeded, and as of today, my Photobucket images have been affected by this as well. I was really curious about what exactly was going on here, so after looking into it, I found out what's going on: Photobucket has decided to ransom its users accounts into having them pay $400 to upgrade their accounts to restore the ability to post images on other sites (including forums) . . . and from what I'm seeing, Photobucket isn't meeting their part of this ponzi scheme and some people out there have already forked over $400 to them only to have nothing changed back.

I don't even know what to do, myself. I've got too many pics uploaded to my bucket over the past twelve years to move them to another service, meanwhile I still don't know of any reliable and secure image-hosting service out there.
 

Old Thunder

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2015
Messages
5,217
Reaction score
3,422
What I've been doing is, instead of uploading my pictures to another site, I've simply stored them away in my files and then uploaded them directly onto whatever I needed them for. It's worked quite well (though I seriously need to clean out that thing :stick_out_tongue: ). Shame to hear about Photobucket, though, that sucks.
 

Bliffenstimmers

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2012
Messages
638
Reaction score
381
This is going to spell bad news for the future of my webcomic. All of the visual elements, apart from the comics themselves, are hosted at Photobucket. They're still there for the time being.
 

D'Snowth

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2003
Messages
40,651
Reaction score
12,811
This is bad news for anybody who uses Photobucket for that exact reason. I honestly have no idea what the Photobucket staff is trying to do: extort money from its users? Make up for lost profits? So many users have questions and nobody from the Photobucket team is answering them - this is just some new policy they initiated totally at random recently . . . but I mean really, $400 just to be able to link pics on forums and such? Some people have already tried paying them that and still haven't had this hotlinking restriction lifted yet.
 

ConsummateVs

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2017
Messages
2,329
Reaction score
1,844
This is bad news for anybody who uses Photobucket for that exact reason. I honestly have no idea what the Photobucket staff is trying to do: extort money from its users? Make up for lost profits? So many users have questions and nobody from the Photobucket team is answering them - this is just some new policy they initiated totally at random recently . . . but I mean really, $400 just to be able to link pics on forums and such? Some people have already tried paying them that and still haven't had this hotlinking restriction lifted yet.
Bummer, I just starting using Photobucket. Are there any better photo sharing sites you'd recommend using instead?
 

D'Snowth

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2003
Messages
40,651
Reaction score
12,811
Not really, because so many other ones out there are so sketchy, that Photobucket was the one I started using in the first place all these years ago because they seemed to be the most reliable, safe, and secure image storing service out there.

I don't even know what I should do at this point: I'm really tempted to migrate to another service, but the problem is I have two different PB accounts (one for person use, the other for sites I maintain and such), both of which have hundreds of pics stored in them, so that would take a lot of time and energy migrating all of that content, not to mention all of the codes and links I would have to change - and even so, some forums like MC don't let you edit your post after a certain grace period of time.

On the other hand, because there's so much backlash and outcry over this from PB users, I figure somehow, someway, this ransom will eventually resolve itself and things will go back to abnormal: it's doubtful and unlikely, but it's possible.
 

ConsummateVs

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2017
Messages
2,329
Reaction score
1,844
Not really, because so many other ones out there are so sketchy, that Photobucket was the one I started using in the first place all these years ago because they seemed to be the most reliable, safe, and secure image storing service out there.

I don't even know what I should do at this point: I'm really tempted to migrate to another service, but the problem is I have two different PB accounts (one for person use, the other for sites I maintain and such), both of which have hundreds of pics stored in them, so that would take a lot of time and energy migrating all of that content, not to mention all of the codes and links I would have to change - and even so, some forums like MC don't let you edit your post after a certain grace period of time.

On the other hand, because there's so much backlash and outcry over this from PB users, I figure somehow, someway, this ransom will eventually resolve itself and things will go back to abnormal: it's doubtful and unlikely, but it's possible.
Would Imgur be an okay site to use? I only have like 3 pictures uploaded on Photobucket, anyway. And I would just use it to upload my art (until I get a DeviantArt), not personal photos.
 

Bliffenstimmers

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2012
Messages
638
Reaction score
381

Well, OP was right. I checked up on my webcomic to update the banner, and lo and behold, all of the website elements I uploaded at photobucket were replaced with a placeholder urging me to upgrade my account to enable third party hosting. Most of these elements have now been re-hosted at imgur, except for the gifs in the news posts, for I am too lazy. Thanks for the heads up!
 
Last edited:

D'Snowth

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2003
Messages
40,651
Reaction score
12,811
I went with Postimage at the suggestion of somebody else - and, so far, it's pretty much as Photobucket always was: a service to host your images for hotlinking for free, they even auto-generate the copy and paste codes you'd need for direct linking, HTML and forum codes, etc. One difference is that while Postimage resizes larger images like Photobucket started doing, at least Postimage retains the original size for you to download, whereas Photobucket just completely resized the image and the damage is irrevisible.
 
Top